HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 471/2025 Shambhu Lal Teli Son Of Sh. Jamak Lal, Aged About 63 Years, Resident Of Gomana Darwaja Ke Paas, Teliyo Ki Gali, Chhoti Sadri, Pratapgarh- Rajasthan (Rajasthan). Worked (Now Retired) As Gram Vikas Adhikari, Panchayat Samiti, Chhoti Sadri, Pratapgarh. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary, Department Of Rural Development And Panchayati Raj, Government Secretariat, Jaipur (Rajasthan). 2. Director, Directorate Of Pension And Pensioners Welfare, Rajasthan, Jaipur, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Jaipur. 3. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Pratapgarh. 4. Block Development Officer, Panchyat Samiti Chhoti Sadri, Pratapgarh, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vishwas Saini for Mr. M.S Raghav For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order 16/01/2025 Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that petitioner was absorbed on the post of Gram-Sevak vide order dated 23.09.2001. It is further submitted that the petitioner has filed an application for re-option before the respondents however the same is still pending and not adjudicated. Furthermore, it is submitted that the controversy in the instant matter is no more res-integra and is decided by the (2 of 2) [CW-471/2025] judgment passed by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in SBCWP No. 3926/2013 titled as Kuldeep Singh and Ors. vs. State of Rajasthan and SBCWP No. 15003/2021 titled as Jamil Hussain Mansuri vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. (Annexure-5 and 6 respectively). Lastly, it is submitted that the respondents in pursuance to the above cited has accorded a chance to the petitioner to submit re-option and thereafter fixation was made accordingly, however the petitioner herein is not treated at par with the similarly situated persons. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, relying upon dictum encapsulated in Jamil Hussain Mansuri (supra), this Court directs the petitioners to file a representation before the competent authority, which is to be considered in light of the directions spelled out in the judgment of Pawan Meena vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. (SBCWP No. 1665/2024) and circular issued by Chief Secretary of Rajasthan, by way of a speaking order and in accordance with law, within the prescribed time of 45 days from filing of the representation. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of with the aforementioned directions. Pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. (SAMEER JAIN),J DIKSHA MISHRA /19