- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:22466 CRL.RP No. 465 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 465 OF 2025 BETWEEN: SRI.A.S. BABU S/O. SIDDALINGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, R/AT BENAKA PHOTO STUDIO, COURT ROAD, PETE, ARKALAGUDU TALUK, HASSAN -57102. …PETITIONER (BY SRI SHAM SUNDAR P., ADVOCATE) AND: SRI. ZAHEER AHMED S/O. CHOTTE SAB, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/AT PETE ROAD, WARD NO.10, ARAKALAGUDU TALUK, HASSAN -57102. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI BHADRINATH R., ADVOCATE) THIS CRL.RP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 397 READ WITH SECTION 401 CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT DATED 29.08.2024 PASSED BY HON’BLE III ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, HASSAN, IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.12/2023 AND THE JUDGMENT OF CONVICTION AND ORDER OF SENTENCE DATED 26.12.2022 PASSED BY THE Digitally signed by LAKSHMINARAYANA MURTHY RAJASHRI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:22466 CRL.RP No. 465 of 2025 ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC ARAKALGUDU, IN C.C.NO.807/2018. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR ORAL ORDER Joint compromise memo has been filed and it is signed by the petitioner, respondent and their respective counsels. As per terms of joint memo, the matter is settled between parties for Rs.4,11,000/- (rupees Four Lakhs Eleven Thousand only). 2. The petitioner has paid Rs.3,31,000/-(rupees Three Lakhs Thirty One Thousand only) to the respondent. The respondent admits that he has received Rs.3,31,000/- (rupees Three Lakhs Thirty One Thousand only) from the petitioner. The amount of Rs.80,000/- (rupees Eighty Thousand only) is in deposit before the trial Court / Appellate Court. The petitioner –accused has no objections for the respondent withdrawing the amount Rs.80,000/- - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:22466 CRL.RP No. 465 of 2025 (rupees Eighty Thousand only) in deposit before the trial Court / Appellate Court. 3. In view of the settlement, the offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 is compounded. In view of the compounding the offence, this Criminal Revision Petition is disposed of as the offence is compounded. 4. The respondent –complainant is at liberty to withdraw the amount of Rs.80,000/- (rupees Eighty Thousand only) deposited by the petitioner before the Trial Court / Appellate Court. 5. In view of the disposal of the case, pending IA’s does not survive for consideration. Sd/- (SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR) JUDGE DSP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 18