SRI.RAVI S/O GOPAL KANGRALKAR v. MAHESHWARI W/O LRAVI KANGRALKAR
MFA/102621/2022 · 2026-03-24
B M Shyam Prasad, Shivashankar Amarannavar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2134 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2134 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:6614-DB MFA No. 102621 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF APRIL, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S G PANDIT AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.102621 OF 2022 (FC) BETWEEN:
SRI. RAVI S/O. GOPAL KANGRALKAR, AGE. 42 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. PLOT NO.169, SCHEME NO.40, 5TH STAGE, KUVEMPU NAGAR, BELAGAVI-591108. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. PRATIK SHIPURKAR S., ADVOCATE)
AND:
SMT. MAHESHWARI W/O. RAVI KANGRALKAR, AGE. 36 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O. C/O. TARAMATI W/O. GANESH KAMBLE, 2ND MAIN, 2ND CROSS, H.NO.4841, SADASHIV NAGAR, BELAGAVI-590019. …RESPONDENT
THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 19(1) OF THE FAMILY COURT ACT 1984, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT DATED 06.11.2020, PASSED IN MATRIMONIAL CASE NO.352/2016 ON THE FILE OF THE JUDGE FAMILY COURT, BELAGAVI AND PASS AN ORDER DISSOLVING THE MARRIAGE SOLEMNIZED BETWEEN THE APPELLANT AND THE RESPONDENT ON 25.11.2013 BY A DECREE OF DIVORCE, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY AND ETC.,.
THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S G PANDIT AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA
Digitally signed by MALLIKARJUN RUDRAYYA KALMATH Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:6614-DB MFA No. 102621 of 2022
ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S G PANDIT)
On 03.04.2025, at request, finally two weeks’ time was granted to comply office objections on payment of costs of Rs.3,000/- to the Advocates’ Association Library Fund, High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench, Dharwad. Till date, office objections are not complied. There is no representation for the appellant in the morning session as well as in the afternoon. It appears that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the case. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for non-compliance of office objections on further cost of Rs.5,000/- payable to the State Legal Service Authority, High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench, Dharwad.
Sd/- (S G PANDIT) JUDGE
Sd/- (C.M. POONACHA) JUDGE
PMP CT: UMD List No.: 2 Sl No.: 23