230 BAJRANG STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER CORAM: Present: HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (Oral) 1. 17.04.2000, copy of which has been the recommendations of the 4 Assured Career Progression Scheme, was implemented. The writ petition was filed 24 years ago and by this time, all the petitioners must have retired. 2. can be safely presumed that the petitioners are not interested in pursuing the present petition. 3. 4. 01-05-2025 Sapna Goyal NOTE: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AT CHANDIGARH CWP-11619 Date of Decision : 01 BAJRANG LAL SINGLA AND OTHERS VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI None for the petitioners. Ms. Akshita Chauhan, DAG Punjab HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (Oral) In the present petition, the challenge is to the Instructions dated 17.04.2000, copy of which has been appended as Annexure P the recommendations of the 4th Punjab Assured Career Progression Scheme, was implemented. The writ petition was filed 24 years ago and by this time, all the petitioners must have retired. As no one has appeared on behalf of the petitioners hence, it can be safely presumed that the petitioners are not interested in pursuing the present petition. Dismissed for non-prosecution. Pending application, if any, also stand 2025 (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) NOTE: Whether speaking: YES Whether reportable: NO IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 11619-2001 (O&M) Date of Decision : 01-05-2025 LAL SINGLA AND OTHERS ........Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER ........Respondent(s) MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI Ms. Akshita Chauhan, DAG Punjab. HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (Oral) In the present petition, the challenge is to the Instructions dated appended as Annexure P-6 by which, Pay Commission qua the grant of Assured Career Progression Scheme, was implemented. The writ petition was filed 24 years ago and by this time, all the petitioners must have retired. As no one has appeared on behalf of the petitioners hence, it can be safely presumed that the petitioners are not interested in pursuing the prosecution. , if any, also stands disposed of. (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) JUDGE : YES NO ........Petitioner(s) ........Respondent(s) MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI In the present petition, the challenge is to the Instructions dated 6 by which, Pay Commission qua the grant of Assured Career Progression Scheme, was implemented. The writ petition was filed 24 years ago and by this time, all the petitioners must have retired. As no one has appeared on behalf of the petitioners hence, it can be safely presumed that the petitioners are not interested in pursuing the (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) SAPNA GOYAL 2025.05.02 10:44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document