Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 21312 (KAR)

SMT B S SUMITHRA v. SMT VISHALAKSHI

CCC/426/2022 · 2025-01-23

G Basavaraja, Krishna S Dixit

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:2795-DB CCC No. 426 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNA S DIXIT AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G BASAVARAJA CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 426 OF 2022 BETWEEN: SMT. B.S. SUMITHRA W/O SRI. H.M. PRABHAKAR AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS RESIDENT OF K.T.790, 13TH CROSS CHAMUNDESHWARI NAGAR MANDYA-571 401. …COMPLAINANT (BY SRI. RAJESHA SHETTIGARA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT. VISHALAKSHI THE SECRETARY KARNATAKA LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY SECRETARIAT VIDHANA SOUDHA DR.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BANGALORE-560 001. 2. SRI. VISHWESHWARA HEGDE KAGERI THE SECRETARY THE HON'BLE SPEAKER AND DISCIPLINARY AND APPOINTING AUTHORITY, KARNATAKA LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY SECRETARIAT VIDHANA SOUDHA, DR.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BANGALORE-560 001. Digitally signed by SHARADA VANI B Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:2795-DB CCC No. 426 of 2022 3. STATE OF KARNATAKA KARNATAKA LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY SECRETARIAT, VIDHANA SOUDHA DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU - 560001. REPRESENT BY ITS SECRETARY ..ACCUSED (BY SRI. ADITYA VIKRAM BHAT, AGA) THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTIONS 11 AND 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, PRAYING TO ISSUE NOTICE TO THE ACCUSED AND TAKE APPROPRIATE PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THE ACCUSED AND PUNISH THEM ACCORDING TO LAW FOR THE DELIBERATE DISOBEDIENCE OF THE ORDER DATED 13.08.2021 PASSED BY THIS HON'BLE COURT IN WP NO.55396/2013 (S-RES) MARKED AS ANNEXURE-K. THIS CCC COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNA S DIXIT and HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G BASAVARAJA ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNA S DIXIT) Application for recalling having been allowed, the order dated 05.01.2024 is recalled and Civil Contempt Petition is restored to the Board. With consent of the parties, matter is taken up for hearing. 2. This complaint alleges violation of order entered in W.A.No.551/2022 wherein a direction was given to reinstatement and for the payment of 50% back wages. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:2795-DB CCC No. 426 of 2022 3. Learned AGA appearing for the respondents has filed a Memo to the effect that the Complainant has been paid back wages in a sum of Rs.9,01,457/- (Rupees Nine Lakh One Thousand Four Hundred & Fifty Seven) only. He hastens to add that since already the Complainant is being reinstated in service, there is substantial compliance of the writ and therefore, these proceedings be dropped. In the above circumstances, this application is disposed off reserving liberty to the Complainant to take appropriate proceedings if some more amount is due in terms of order whose violation is complained of, in accordance with law. In that connection all the contention of both the sides are kept open. Sd/- (KRISHNA S DIXIT) JUDGE Sd/- (G BASAVARAJA) JUDGE DS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 5