4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI WEDNESDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSANDAND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO FAMILY COURT APPEAL (FCA) NO: 219 OF 2017 Appeal under section 47 of Guardian and Wards Act, against the order and decree dt.27.07.2016 passed in G.W.O.P No.505 of 2010 by the learned Family Judge, Vijayawada. Between: Nagam Ravi Kiran, S/o Satyanarayana, R/o H.No.5-82, Phase-ll, Mythri Nagar, Alwyn Colony Road, Madinaguda, Hyderabad. ...Appellant/Petitioner AND Nagam Girija @ Girija Kumari, W/o. Ravi Kiran, D/o A.V.Narasaiah, R/o Plot No.66, CTO Colony, Vijayawada. ...Respondent/ Respondent I.A. NO: 2 OF 2017(FCAMP. NO: 337 OF 2017) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased grant interim custody of the minor child Nagam Sri Charanya to the petitioner pending final disposal of the FCA. Counsel for the Appellant: Sri. M Naga Ragh Counsel for the Respondents: Sri Sivalenka Ramachandra Prasad The Court made the following: u APHC010301752017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3526] WEDNESDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO: 219 OF 2017 Between: Nagam Ravi Kiran ...APPELLANT AND Nagam Girija Girija Kumari Counsel for the'Appellant; 1.Mr. M NAGARAGHU Counsel for the Respondent: 1.Mr. SIVALENKA RAMACHANDRA PRASAD ...RESPONDENT / 2 The Court made the following JUDGMENT: (Perujs.j, The present Appeal is preferred by the appellan^husband against the passed in GWOP No.505 of 2010, on the file of which was filed under the provisions of the seeking a direction to the respondent-wife to minor daughter Nagam Sree Charanya order dated 27.07.2f016 Family Court, Vijayawada Guardian and Wards Act-1890 handover custody of the mi appellant. to the 2. At the time of considering the matter, the learned counsel for the appellant stated that in view of the subsequent development i10-, the said Ms.N.Sree Charanya attained majority, the matter has become infructuous. Recording the submission made, the Appeal is dismissed. No costs. 3. Consequently, Miscellaneous Applications pending, if any, shall also stand dismissed. 'if '■ Sd/- S.V.S.R. MIJRHTT JOINT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER / //TRUE COPY// To, 1. Jhe Family Judge, Vijayawada ’ Krishna District (with 2. One CC to Sri. M Naga Raghu Advocate [OPUCj 3. One CC to Sri. Sivalenka Ramachandra Section, 5. Two CD Copies records if Prasad Advocate [OPUC] High Court of Andhra Pradesh at stu RAM \\ \. ■ HIGH COURT DATED:07/05/2025 JUDGMENT FCA.No.219 of 2017 DISMISSING THE FCA AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS