Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 21301 (RAJ)

IMRAN S/O HAKAM v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/7386/2025 · 2025-08-08

Praveer Bhatnagar

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:30844] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6880/2025 1. Sameem S/o Shaheed, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Arduka, Police Station Gopalgarh, District Deeg. (The Accused Petitioner Is At Present Confined In Sub Jail Deeg). 2. Vakeel Ahmed @ Vakki S/o Akram, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Arduka, Police Station Gopalgarh, District Deeg. (The Accused Petitioner Is At Present Confined In Sub Jail Deeg). ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7240/2025 1. Khushal S/o Aasu, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Bhilmaka, Police Station Deeg District Deeg. (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Deeg). 2. Aalam S/o Abdul Gafur, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Bhilmaka, Police Station Deeg District Deeg. (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Deeg). 3. Jamil S/o Iliyas, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Bhilmaka, Police Station Deeg District Deeg. (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Deeg). 4. Ahmed S/o Baljeet, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Bhilmaka, Police Station Deeg District Deeg. (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Deeg). 5. Muskan S/o Jamshed, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Bhilmaka, Police Station Deeg District Deeg. (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Deeg). ----Petitioners Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7357/2025 Mubarik S/o Samsu, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Village Daulatpur, [2025:RJ-JP:30844] (2 of 4) [CRLMB-6880/2025] Police Station Goverdhan, District Mathura, (At Present In Central Jail, Bharatpur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7386/2025 1. Imran S/o Hakam, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Village Dauseras, Police Station Goverdhan, District Mathura. (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Sub Jail Deeg). 2. Ikran S/o Hakam, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Village Dauseras, Police Station Goverdhan, District Mathura. (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Sub Jail Deeg). ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sanjay Khan, Mr. Surendra Singh, Mr. Anoop Kumar, Mr. Arafat Hussain For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh, PP, Mr. Ravinder Kumar for complainant HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 08/08/2025 1. These instant bail applications have been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-petitioners. The accused- petitioners have been arrested in connection with FIR No. 113/2025 registered at Police Station Deeg, District Deeg for the offences under Sections 111(6), 303(2), 317(2), 319(2), 318(4), [2025:RJ-JP:30844] (3 of 4) [CRLMB-6880/2025] 338, 336(3), 340(2), 308(2) and 61(2)(a) of BNS and Section 66(D) of IT Act. 2. Learned counsels for the accused-petitioners submit that the accused-petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. They further submit that the offences alleged against the accused- petitioners are exclusively triable by Magistrate. The accused- petitioners are in custody since long and the trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, these bail applications of the accused-petitioners may be allowed. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor as well as learned counsel for the complainant have vehemently opposed these bail applications 4. Heard and perused the material available on record. 5. Considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the parties and looking to the fact that the offences alleged against the accused-petitioners are exclusively triable by Magistrate, the accused-petitioners are in custody since long and the trial of the case may take considerable time, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioners on bail. 6. Accordingly, these bail applications under Section 483 BNSS are allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioners namely: 1. Sameem S/o Shaheed, 2. Vakeel Ahmed @ Vakki S/o Akram, 3. Khushal S/o Aasu, 4. Aalam S/o Abdul Gafur, 5. Jamil S/o Iliyas, 6. Ahmed S/o Baljeet, 7. Muskan S/o Jamshed, 8. Mubarik S/o Samsu, 9. Imran S/o Hakam and 10. Ikran S/o Hakam, in connection with FIR No. 113/2025 registered at Police Station Deeg, District Deeg, shall be enlarged on bail provided each of them furnish a personal bond in the sum [2025:RJ-JP:30844] (4 of 4) [CRLMB-6880/2025] of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for their appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. The accused-petitioners namely: 1. Vakeel Ahmed, 2. Imran, 3. Ikran and 4. Mubarik are also directed to mark their presence on 25th of every month till conclusion of trial before the concerned police station. The SHO of the concerned police station is directed to maintain a regular register marking the presence of the accused-petitioners and shall send the presence report of the accused-petitioners on the same day to the concerned Trial Court without any delay. In case of any breach to the above condition, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the applications against the petitioners for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Keshav/134-137