1 2025:CGHC:1820 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 3679 of 2024 1 - Vikas Kedia S/o Late Gajanand Kedia Aged About 43 Years R/o Akaltara, Tahsil Akaltara, District Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) 2 - Anuradha Singhaniya W/o Shri Rajendra Singhaniya, D/o Late Gajanand Kedia Aged About 52 Years R/o Minocha Colony Bilaspur, Tahsil And District Bilaspur (C.G.) 3 - Shweta Poddar W/o Shri Sandeep Poddar, D/o Late Gajanand Kedia Aged About 48 Years R/o Green Garden Colony Bilaspur, Tahsil And District Bilaspur (C.G.) 4 - Parul Agrawal W/o Shri Manoj Agrawal, D/o Late Gajanand Kedia Aged About 40 Years R/o Green Saffire Colony Raipur, Tahsil And District Raipur (C.G.) 5 - Ram Kedia S/o Late Gajanand Kedia Aged About 50 Years R/o Rama Life City Bilaspur, Tahsil And District Bilaspur (C.G.) Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Collector Janjgir, District Janjgir- Champa (C.G.) 2 - Commissioner, Bilaspur Division Bilaspur (C.G.) 3 - S.D.O. (Revenue) Janjgir District Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) 4 - Tehsildar, Janjgir District Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) RAHUL JHA Digitally signed by RAHUL JHA Date: 2025.01.13 12:21:54 +0530 2 5 - Hari Singh Chandel S/o Late Bharat Singh Chandel Aged About 69 Years R/o Tarod, Tahsil Janjgir, District Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) 6 - Krishnagopal Singh Chandel S/o Late Bharat Singh R/o Tarod, Tahsil Janjgir, District Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) 7 - Kaushilya Singh Chandel Wd/o Ramshankar Singh Chandel R/o Tarod, Tahsil Janjgir, District Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) 8 - Benimadhav Singh Chandel S/o Late Bharat Singh R/o Tarod, Tahsil Janjgir, District Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) 9 - Chhapriya Minerals Through Sanjay Chhapriya, R/o Chhapriya Villa, Jain Mandir, Main Road, Kranti Nagar Tahsil And District Bilaspur (C.G.) Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : None For Respondent(s) : Mr. Risabh Bisen, PL (HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE BIBHU DATTA GURU) Order on Board 10/01/2025 1. On repeated call, no one appears on behalf of the petitioner. Even the petitioner has not complied with order dated 25/07/2024 and there are several defaults in the petition, therefore, this Court has no other option except to dismiss this case for want of prosecution. 2. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (BIBHU DATTA GURU) JUDGE Rahul