ANIL SHARMA S/O LT. SHRI RAJU SHARMA v. STATE OF RAJ.
CRLMB/7389/2025 · 2025-07-29
Pramil Kumar Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 21300 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 21300 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:28524] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7388/2025 Akash Diwakar S/o Shri Mukesh Diwakar, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Behind Hanuman Temple, Vidhyadhar Nagar, Naglapati Dayal Bag S O Police Station New Agra District Agra Uttarpradesh. (Present Confined In Centre Jail Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Raj., Through PP ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7389/2025 Anil Sharma S/o Lt. Shri Raju Sharma, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Plot No. 38/G/B/44 Vidhyanagar, Naglapati Dayal Bag, Behind Hanuman Temple, Police Station New Agra, District Agra Uttar Pradesh At Present R/o Plot No. 7-8 Krashana Colony, Sushilpura, Pancholi Bhawan Sodala, Police Station Sodala, Jaipur. (Present Confined In Centre Jail Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Raj., Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vinod Kumar Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Naresh Kumar Sharma, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR
Order 29/07/2025
1. The petitioners have preferred these bail applications under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.0006/2025 registered at Police Station-Vishwakarma, District-Jaipur (West) for offences under Sections 318(4), 316(2), 319(2), 318(3) and 61(2)(a) of BNS.
[2025:RJ-JP:28524] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-7388/2025]
2. Since both the bail applications arise out of common FIR, therefore these cases are being decided by a single order.
3. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.
4.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in these cases. It is contended that the allegation against the petitioners are that they have extorted Rs.2,50,000/- from the victim under the guise of marriage. It is further contended that the co-accused-Neelam Sharma has been released on bail by the trial court itself. The petitioners are behind the Bar since 20.05.2025 and charge-sheet has been filed. It is also contended that no previous case is pending against them and the offences are triable by a Magistrate. The trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioners in further custody, hence the bail applications of the petitioners may be allowed.
5. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail applications.
6. On consideration of the rival submission and material available on record and deliberating all the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioners.
7. Accordingly, the bail applications under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioners- (1) Akash
[2025:RJ-JP:28524] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-7388/2025] Diwakar S/o Shri Mukesh Diwakar (2) Anil Sharma S/o Lt. Shri Raju Sharma shall be released on bail on their furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for their appearance before that Court on all the dates till conclusion of the trial.
( PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J sunita/178-179