APHC010301042024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION No.15233/2024 Between: 1. MUKKU SATYANARAYANA, S/O. LATE NARASIMHA RAO, AGED 59 YEARS, R/O.D.NO.17-152, R.K.NAGAR, CHINTALAPUDI VILLAGE AND MANDAL, ELURU DISTRICT. 2. MUKKU NAVEEN GOUD, S/O. MUKKU SATYANARAYANA, AGED 36 YEARS, R/O. D.NO.17-152, R.K.NAGAR, CHINTALAPUDI VILLAGE AND MANDAL, ELURU DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ELURU, ELURU DISTRICT. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ELURU, ELURU DISTRICT. 4. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, JANGAREDDYGUDEM, ELURU DISTRICT. 5. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CHINTALAPUDI CIRCLE POLICE STATION, ELURU DISTRICT. 6. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, CHINTALAPUDI POLICE STATION, ELURU DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the respondents in not considering my representation dated 12.04.2024 even after receiving of the representation no action has been initiated by the respondents is highly unwarranted and highly unjust, illegal and violative of articles 14, 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to consider the representation submitted by the petitioner dated 12.04.2024 and pass 2 Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. PATHI SIVA PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME This Court made the following: ORDER: The instant Writ Petition is filed by the Petitioners seeking indulgence of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: “ .... to issue a Writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the respondents in not considering my representation dated 12.04.2024 even after receiving of the representation no action has been initiated by the respondents is highly unwarranted and highly unjust, illegal and violative of Articles 14, 21 of Constitution of India and consequently, direct the respondents to consider the representation submitted by the petitioner dated 12.04.2024 and pass ....” 2. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioners and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondent State. Perused the material on record. 3. Learned counsel for the Petitioners would submit that during pendency of this Writ Petition, Petitioners made a complaint before the District Police Complaints Authority. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions, would submit that there are civil disputes pending between the parties and that case and counter cases were filed by the parties and after completion of investigation, Police filed charge sheet in the cases before 3 the concerned Trial Court and CC number is awaited and that this Court may pass appropriate orders. 5. In that view, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* 4 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Writ Petition No. 15233 2024 19.08.2025 Mjl /*