[2025:RJ-JP:23341] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7371/2025 1. Sandeep Kumar S/o Kundanlal, Aged About 32 Years, R/o House No. 157, Ward No. 02, Todapur Heli Mandi Jatoli, Police Station Heli Mandi Jatoli, District Gurgaon (Haryana) (At Present Confined In District Jail, Dausa). 2. Sundar Singh S/o Nafaisingh, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Gopalpur, Police Station Kharkhoda, District Sonipat (Haryana) (At Present Confined In District Jail, Dausa). ----Petitioners Versus State of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Aradhana Swami For Respondent(s) : Mr. M.S. Shekhawat, P.P. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA (V. J.) Judgment / Order 18/06/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 on behalf of the petitioners, who have been arrested in connection with FIR No.10/2025-26 registered at Police Station Excise Prohibition Squad, Dausa for the offence punishable under Sections 19/54, 14/54 & 54(a) of Rajasthan Excise Act, 1950. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel also submits that there are no criminal antecedents against the petitioners. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioners are in custody since 17.05.2025 and trial will take considerable time. Further custody of the petitioners would not serve any fruitful purpose. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioners. [2025:RJ-JP:23341] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-7371/2025] 4. Heard and considered the contentions made by the learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioners and also the fact that there are no criminal antecedents against the petitioners and period of their custody, but without commenting any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it fit and proper to allow this bail application. 6. The bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that petitioners 1.Sandeep Kumar S/o Kundanlal & 2.Sundar Singh S/o Nafaisingh shall be released on bail provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. It is made clear that the petitioners shall not involve in any other offence(s) of similar nature during the currency of this bail. 8. The petitioners shall not tamper with any evidence, nor would influence the witnesses in this case. 9. If any breach of these conditions is reported or come to the notice of the Court, the same shall alone be a reason for the Trial Court to cancel this bail granted to them by this Court. (MANEESH SHARMA (V. J.)),J DANISH USMANI /121