Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 21299 (AP)

MD AKBAR v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

CRLP/6142/2025 · 2025-06-29

K Sreenivasa Reddy

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Eii= > a IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMAF MONDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JUNE, / TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE :PRESENT: TJffiONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENIVASA REDD CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 6142 OF 2025 Betwee n : 1. Md Akbar, S/o.Islam @ AbjaI, aged about 29 years, R/o. H.No.C- 389, JJ Colony, Bawana PO, North West Delhi State. 2. Ismail, S/o. LaIIu, Aged abt 33 years, R/o. H.No.C-442, JJ Colony, Bawana PO, North West Delhi State. 3. Mukesh, S/o.Late Ashok, Aged about 27 years, R/o. H.No.C-651, JJ colony, Bawana PO, North West Delhi State. 4. Saniya, D/o.Late Rakimuisekh, Aged about 26 years, R/o. H.No.B- 52, JJ Colony, Bawana PO, North West Delhi State. ...petitioner/Al to A4 AND The State of Andhra Pradesh, SH.O, GRP P.S., Vizianagaram, Represented by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati, Guntur District. ./ ...Respondent petition under section 480 & 483 of BNSS, 2023 (Under Section 437 & 439 of Cr.P.C) of Cr.P.C, praying that in the Circumstances Stated in memorandum of grounds of criminal petition, the High Court may be pleased to enlarge the Pet.ltioners on Regular Bail in respect to the Crime No.49/2025 on the file of GRP Police Station, Vizianagaram; The petition coming on for hearing, upon Perusing the Petition and memorandum of grounds of criminal petition and upon hearing the arguments of sri Anand Kumar Kochiri, Advocate for the Petitioners and public Prosecutor for the Respondent, the Court made the following; '\ ny f,I i.'*\+ -I+ ``t / APHCO10301182025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (special original Jurisdiction) [3327] MONDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE 'K SREENIVASA REDDY CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 6142/2025 Between : Md Akbar and Others m.PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S) AND The State Of Andhra ".RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT Pradesh Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S): 1.ANAND KUMAR KOCHIRI Counsel for the Respondent/complainant: 1.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court Made the Followin Order:- This Criminal Petition, under Sections 480 and 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, has been filed by the petitioners/Al to A4, seeking regular bail, in Crime No.49 of 2025 of Vizianagaram Police Station, GRP Vijayawada, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 20(b)(ii)(C) read with 8(c) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. 2. Case of the prosecution, in brief, is that, on 22.03.2025, the R.P. Sub-Inspector along with his staff and mediators proceeded to board Kirandol Express at S.Kota Railway Station and the caught the accused in possession of 61Kgs of Ganja. The contraband, along with other material, was seized under cover of a mediators |`-`- ( ` + E= EEL-a report. The accused were arrested and got remanded to judicial Custody. 3. Heard. perusedtherecord. 4. The petitioners are jn J-udl-Cjal Custody since 22.03.2025. The quantity of Ganja allegedly seized from the possessI-On Of the accused is 61Kgs. Learned Assistant pub[l'c prosecutor submitted that major portion of jnvestjga{l-on has been completed and there are no antecedents agal'nst the petitioners hereI'n. 5. ln vI-eWOfthe aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, thl-s court is inclined to grant baj[ to the petitioners/Al to A4 on the following conditions. i) The pet['tjoners/Al to A4 shall be released on ba" on theI'r executI-ng Personal bond for Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand only) each with two sureties of the [I-ke Sum each to the satI-SfaCtjOn of the learned vI Additional Judicial Magistrate of First class for Railways, Visakhapatnam. ii) On release, the petI'tiOnerS Shall appear before the station House officer concerned, once in a week i.e. on every sunday, between 10.00 am and o1.00 pm, tj" filing of the charge sheet. jjI-) PetI't].Oners/Al to A4 shall not go beyond the jurI-SdiCtl'On Of vizianagaram district, Andhra pradesh state, without leave of the ^ i= ` -i-i-..-.:` trial Court and they shall make available their location through mobile phones by pairing them with the mobile phone of the Investigating Officer round the clock. 6. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is allowed. r___ G3d,I- K. *~AAS!P,A,® JiS g,!€ S-i'.Att!l' //TRUE COPY// ForJ SEC,ng-!ORE ®F'Flf,ER To]1 The VI Addltlonal Judlclal Maglstrate Of Flrst Class for RallwayS, VisakhaPatam. 2. The Superintendent, Central Jail, VisakhaPatnam. 3. The Station House Officer, GRP Police Station, Viz-lanagaram 4. One CC to Sri. Anand Kumar Kochiri, Advocate [OPUC] 5. Two CCs to Publ-lc Prosecutor, H-lgh Court of AP [OUT] 6. One spare COPY _MM HIGH COURT SRK,J DATED :30/06/2025 ORDER CRLP.No.6142 of 2025 ALLOWED