Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 21297 (AP)

P. NARESH KUMAR, v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/13907/2019 · 2025-09-17

B V L N Chakravarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010301432019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] THURSDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 13907/2019 Between: 1. P. NARESH KUMAR,, S/O RANGA RAO, AGED 28 YEARS, R/O H. NO.. 21-21-24, RAMALINGESWARA PET, TENALI TOWN, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH 2. P. UDAY KUMAR, , S/O RANGA RAO, AGED 30 YEARS, R/O H. NO.. 21-21-24, RAMALINGESWARA PET, TENALI TOWN, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY (HOME DEPARTMENT), SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS AMARAVATHI, ANDHRA PRADESH 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, FOR THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT VIJAYAWADA, ANDHRA PRADESH 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, AT GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, NAGARAM POLICE STATION, NAGARAM, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH 5. THE SUBINSPECTOR OF POLICE, NAGARAM POLICE STATION, NAGARAM, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH 6. MATHI KRISHNA BAJI, S/O KRISHNA PRASAD, AGED 30 YEARS, OCC.. SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE, R/O NAGARAM,GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 4th and 5th respondents in not registering a FIR against the illegal actions of 6th Respondent and his henchmen who is creating physical and psychological trauma to the petitioners whenever the petitioners opposes the 6th Respondent from grabbing the petitioners' properties as well as illegally detaining the Petitioners without any Cause or Reason whenever the Petitioners try to visit their properties despite of several reports made by the Petitioners without initiating proceedings against the 6th Respondent for mi-using the Power of Police as illegal, arbitrary and also oppose to the all cannons of justice, consequentially direct the Respondent No.. 2 to 3, to protect the petition N- as well as his family members from the clutches of the 6th Respondent by initiating proceedings against the 6th Respondent for mis-using the Power of Police as well as registering an FIR against the 6th Respondent and his henchmen IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent No.: 2 to 3, to protect the petitioner as well as his family members from the clutches of the 6th Respondent by initiating proceedings against the 6th Respondent for mis-using the Power of Police as well as registering an FIR against the 6th Respondent & his henchmen and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. J K RANJIT KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO:13907 of 2019 The Court made the following Order: This Court after perusing the earlier proceedings gave a direction on 11.09.2025, to list the matter under the caption ‘For Dismissal’. However, today also, there is no representation for the petitioners. 2. Learned Additional Government Pleader representing the State is in attendance. 3. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. No order as to costs. Interlocutory applications, if any, pending shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI Dated: 18.09.2025 PSA 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 13907 of 2019 Date: 18.09.2025 PSA