- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:25817 CRL.A No. 580 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE M G UMA CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 580 OF 2021 BETWEEN: 1. SYED NIZAM @ NIZAM S/O SYED NAZEER, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, R/AT NO.11, G STREET, SHIVAJINAGAR BANGALORE - 560 051 2. TOUFIQ S/O FIROZ AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS R/AT MILLAT NAGAR NEAR SYEDIYA MADRASA KAVAL BYRASANDRA BANGALORE - 560 032. 3. NAYAZ SHARIEFF S/O JAFFER SHARIEFF AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS R/O NEAR RAMA TENT 2ND CROSS, KUSHAL NAGAR K.G. HALLI, BENGALURU - 560 045 4. AYAZ S/O IQBAL AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS R/AT 6TH CROSS, S.R. BLOCK D.J. HALLI, BANGALORE - 560 045. 5. MUBARAK S/O MOHAMMED KALEEM AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS R/AT NO.283, 6TH CROSS, S.R. BLOCK, D.J. HALLI, BANGALORE - 560 045 Digitally signed by SWAPNA V Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:25817 CRL.A No. 580 of 2021 6. YOUSUF KHAN S/O FIROZ KHAN AGED ABOUT 19 YEARS R/AT NO.72, NEAR KHUBA MASJID, SHAMPUR MAIN ROAD, D.J HALLI BANGALORE - 560 045 7. SYED SAMEER S/O SYED SALEEM AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS R/AT 2ND CROSS, OPP KUPPAM COMPOUND PERIYAR NAGAR, D.J. HALLI BANGALORE - 560 045 8. GIDDU @ HASEEB S/O ANWAR AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, R/AT NO.8, KAREEMLAL ROAD, D.J. HALLI, BANGALORE - 560 045 9. KAREEMULLA BASHA S/O IQBAL BASHA AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS R/AT NO.16, 4TH CROSS R.T. NAGAR, BANGALORE - 560 032 10. HIDAYATH ALI KHAN S/O BASHEER KHAN AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS R/AT NO.16, 4TH CROSS R.T NAGAR, BANGALORE - 560 032 11. CHAND PASHA S/O HAROON BASHA AGED ABOUT 20 YEARS R/AT TIPPU STREET MODI ROAD, D.J HALLI BANGALORE - 560 045 12. SYED ABDUL RAZACK S/O SYED AHMED KHADRI AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS R/O LIYAKHAT MANZIL - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:25817 CRL.A No. 580 of 2021 N.P. FACTORY P AND T COLONY BENGALURU - 560 045 13. NAYAZ S/O FAYAZ AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS R/AT NO.32, 1ST CROSS DUBAI LAYOUT, D.J. HALLI, BENGALURU - 560 045 14. AZAM AHMED S/O NASEER AHMED AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS R/AT NO. 3/18 BEHIND KHUBA MASJID SHAMPUR MAIN ROAD D.J HALLI, BANGALORE - 560 045 …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. ANEES ALI KHAN, ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND: 1. STATE BY D.J. HALLI P.S. BANGALORE - 560 045 REPRESENTED BY THE SPECIAL PROSECUTOR MR. P PRASANNA KUMAR T-5, 3RD FLOOR, KRISHNA TOWERS NO. 21/22, 3RD MAIN ROAD OPP. SAPNA BOOK HOUSE GANDHI NAGARA BANGALORE - 560 009 2. SRI PAVAN KUMAR .T. AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, R/A NO. 48, RAMASWAMY NILAYA JAYAMATHAMMA STREET NAGAMMA LAYOUT KAVAL BYRASANDRA BENGALURU - 560 032 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. HARISH GANAPATHY, HCGP FOR R1) - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:25817 CRL.A No. 580 of 2021 THIS CRL.A IS FILED U/S.14A OF SC/ST (POA) ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 01.04.2021 PASSED IN SPL.C.NO.758/2020 FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 143, 144, 147, 148, 504, 435, 436, 448, 395, 427 R/W 149 OF IPC AND SECTION 2 OF KARNATAKA PREVENTION OF DESTRUCTION AND LOSS OF PROPERTY ACT AND SECTION 3(1)(C)(R)(S), 3(2),(III),(V),(VA) OF SC/ST (POA) ACT IN SPL.C.NO.758/2020 OF D.J.HALLI POLICE STATION, PENDING ON THE FILE OF LXX ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE AND SPECIAL JUDGE, BENGALURU (CCH-71) AND ENLARGE THE APPELLANTS ON STATUTORY BAIL UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF SEC. 167(2) OF CR.P.C. THIS CRL.A, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE M G UMA ORAL JUDGMENT Learned counsel for the appellants is absent. No representation even when the matter is passed over twice and again called in the afternoon session. The order sheet dated 07.07.2025 reads as under: " Heard learned counsel for the appellants on office objection regarding maintainability of the appeal. It is stated that accused Nos.1 to 9 and 11 have preferred other appeal and the present appeal is by accused No.10 and therefore, the appeal is maintainable. - 5 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:25817 CRL.A No. 580 of 2021 Accepting the contentions taken by the learned counsel for the appellants, the office objection regarding maintainability is rejected. It is held the criminal appeal is maintainable. The criminal appeal is of the year 2021. Still the office objections are not yet complied with. List this matter finally, as a last chance, on 14.07.2025." Inspite of that, there is no representation and the office objections are not yet complied with. It appears that the appellants are not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for non-compliance of office objections. Sd/- (M G UMA) JUDGE SPV CT:VS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 11