Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 212901 (MAD)

M.Lakshmi v. Thangaraj

CONT P(MD)/3080/2025 · 2025-11-21

B Pugalendhi

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Cont.P.(MD)No.3080 of 2025 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 21.11.2025 CORAM : THE HON`BLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI Cont.P.(MD)No.3080 of 2025 M.Lakshmi ... Petitioner Vs. Thangaraj, The Proprietor of M/s.Karpaga Vinayagar Modern Rice Mill/Management, No.160/4W, Ilanthiraikondan Main Road, Dhalavaipuram Post, Rajapalayam Taluk, Virudhunagar District. ... Respondent Prayer : Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, to punish the contemnor / 5th respondent for his wilful disobedience of the order of this Court dated 25.04.2025 passed in WP.(MD)No.30910 of 2024. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Rajamohan For Respondent : Mrs.V.Muthukamatchi 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Cont.P.(MD)No.3080 of 2025 ORDER The petitioner has approached this Court that the order of this Court in WP.(MD)No.30910 of 2024 dated 25.04.2025 has not been complied with. The petitioner herein is the second respondent and the contemnor is the fifth respondent in the writ petition in WP.(MD)No.30910 of 2024. 2.The learned counsel for the contemnor/respondent has produced a demand draft for a sum of Rs.3,00,000/- and submits that the contemnor/ respondent is intending to deposit the same before the Labour Court. 3.The learned counsel for the petitioner has pointed out that this Court, while disposing the writ petition in WP.(MD)No.30910 of 2024 has issued a direction to the contemnor/respondent herein to pay the amount directly to the petitioner herein. While so, the stand of the contemnor/respondent in depositing the amount before the Labour Court is not proper. 4.This Court has considered the submissions made on either side and perused the available records. 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Cont.P.(MD)No.3080 of 2025 5.Since this Court while disposing the writ petition, has issued a direction to the contemnor/respondent to pay the amount only to the petitioner herein, the contemnor in all fairness ought to have get clarification, if needed, before the concerned Court. The contemnor/respondent cannot take a plea in this contempt petition. Considering the manner in which the contemnor/ respondent has driven the petitioner to file this contempt petition to implement the order passed by this Court, this Court directs the contemnor/respondent to pay a sum of Rs.10,000/- to the petitioner as litigation expenses. Accordingly, this contempt petition is closed. 21.11.2025 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet:Yes gns To Thangaraj, The Proprietor of M/s.Karpaga Vinayagar Modern Rice Mill/Management, No.160/4W, Ilanthiraikondan Main Road, Dhalavaipuram Post, Rajapalayam Taluk, Virudhunagar District. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Cont.P.(MD)No.3080 of 2025 B.PUGALENDHI,J gns Cont.P.(MD)No.3080 of 2025 21.11.2025 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis