IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATl MONDAY ,THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE :PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE YI LAKSHMANA RAO CR.lMINAL PETITION NO: 6643 OF 2025 Between.- [3521] 1. Sayyed Karimun, c/o. Abdul Khudclus Aged about 61 years, R/o.D.No.3-25/2, Patibandia, Guntur DistrI'Ct. 2. Sayyed Abdul Khuddus, , c/o.Ibrahim, Aged about 65 years, R/o.D.No.3-25/2, Patibandia, Guntur District. Petitioners/Accused 4 & 5 AND The State of Andhra Pra,desh, Rep. by its public prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh, ArnaravalhI', Gun{ur District. Respondent/complainant Petition under section 482 of BNSS (438 of Cr.P.C.,) praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to issue a direction to the Respondent police that jn the event of arrest of petitioners/Accused Nos. 4 & 5, they sha" be released on bail in Crl-me No.65/2025 of Medikonduru police Station, Guntur District by granting Anticipatory Bail to the Petitioners/Accused Nos. 4 & 5 COUNSEL FOR THE PETITIONER : SRI. MANIKANTA THOTA COUNSEL FOR THE RESPONDENT : PUBLIC PROSECUTOR THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING ORDER The Court made the following ORDER: The Criminal Petition has been filed under Section 438 of the Code of crimin-al procedure, by the petitioners for granting of pre-arrest bail in connection,with crime No.65 of 2025 of Medikonduru Pol'lce Station, Guntur I 'DiStrict,+registered for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 118(1 ), t` i'15(`2),~ 351 (2) read with 3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (for short tthe BNSI). 2. Facts, in brief, of the Case are that On ll.04.2025 at 22:00 hours, at t) perecherla Village of Medikonduru Mandal, all the accused came tO the complainan{Js house to talk about his family issues and beat him in the abdomen with stick. Accused Nos.2 and 3 beat the complainant with the hands and legs and the complainant]s brother by name Kaleshavali obstructed and compromised them. on 14.04.2025, at about 01 :30 hours, Accused No.1 and his friends came to the complainant house and beat him. On 15.04.2025, at 12:30 hours, the comPIainant drank poison due tO the insult made by the accused and shifted to Guntur GGH Hospital. Hence, the police registered a CaSe- 3. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and the learned Assistant public prosecutor. Perused the record. 4. .Sri Manikanta Thota, learned counsel fOr{he Petitioners Submits that the petitioners are sole bread w-lnners of their family. The petitioners have not committed any offence and they were falsely implicated in this case. The petitioners would abide by any condition to be imposed by th'ls court. E= 5. -Percon£ra, Ms. P. Akila Naidu, the learned Assistant Public'Prosecutor, opposed in granting of bail stating that the petitI-OnerS are habitual Offenders, some more m-aterial witnesses have {o be exami`ned,- investigation is not completed,- if the petitioners are enlarged on bail, they would not be available for the investigation and they would escape from the clutches of la-w; and urged to dismiss the bail petition. 6. ln this case, the other accused except these two accused who are Accused Nos.4 and 5, were enlarged on bail. There is no iota of allegation against the petitioner in the complaint lodged by the de facto coinplainant. The Petitioners are age'd about 61 years and 65 years respectively. 7. ConsI'dering the entire gamut of the case, the nature and gravity of allegation levelled against the petitioners and their alleged role played in the case and competition of material witnesses of the investigation, this court deems it fit to grant pre-arrest bail to the petitioners with the following directions: a) ln the event of arrest of the petitioners, the petitioners shall be enlarged' on bail on executing a personal bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees ten thousand only), with two suretl-es each for the like sum each to -the satisfaction of the arresting police officials; b) The petitioners shall make themselves available for investigation as and when required; c) The petitioners shall not cause any threa|l, inducement or promise to the Prosecution Witnesses; d) The petitioners shall appear before the station Hous; Officer concerned I once in a week i.e., on every second saturday between 10.00 a-.m. and O5'.00 P.m., till filing of the charge sheet. `~-- e) The petitioner shall not leave the district limits without the express permission from the station House Officer concerned. 8. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is allowed. SD/-M.SRINIVAS ASSISTAfroREGISTRAR For/ lITFtuE COPYII SECTION OFFICER To'; TohneeSctactltoon sH::s;;f{llC:'NMTeAdikHO:dTu;uAPdvo:cceat:t[a:I:nu'c:untur Dlstrlct / 3 Two CCs to PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, Hlgh Court OfA.P[OUT] 4. One spare COPY E= HIGH COURT DR.YLR,J DATED:14/07/2025 BAIL ORDER CRLP.No.6643 of 2025 ALLOWED