Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No. 11887 of 2025
Decided on: 11.09.2025
Jeet Ram ....Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Ors.
....Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr Justice Rakesh Kainthla, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? For the Petitioner : Mr. Karan Kapoor, Advocate, For the Respondents/State : Mr. Ajit Sharma, Deputy Advocate General.
Rakesh Kainthla,Judge (Oral)
Learned Deputy Advocate General, under instructions, submits that since the parole has been granted to the petitioner on 04.09.2025, hence, the instant petition has rendered infructuous. This fact has confirmed by the learned counsel for the petitioner.
2.
In view of above, the present petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of.
(Rakesh Kainthla)
Judge 11th September, 2025.
(Ravinder)