[2025:RJ-JP:26254] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous IIIrd Bail Application No. 7347/2025 Santram S/o Motishankar, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Gram Gujariya Kheda, Police Station Dei, District Bundi (Raj.) (Presently Confined In District Jail At Bundi). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous IVth Bail Application No. 8885/2025 Jodhraj S/o Bherulal, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Village Laxmipura, Police Station Nainwa, District Bundi (Raj.) (At Present In District Jail Bundi). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajendra Singh Tanwar Mr. Amit Jindal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Tapesh Agarwal, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL Order 15/07/2025 1. These bail applications have been filed by petitioners under Section 483 of the BNSS in connection with FIR No.276/2023 registered at Police Station Nainwa, District Bundi for offence(s) under Sections 147, 148, 149, 447, 307 and 302 IPC. 2. The second bail application of accused-Santram was dismissed as withdrawn vide order dated 27.01.2025 and the third bail application filed by accused-Jodhraj was dismissed as [2025:RJ-JP:26254] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-7347/2025] withdrawn vide order dated 16.05.2025, however, again these bail applications have been filed by petitioners after a short span of time. 3. Counsel for petitioners submits that out of 52 prosecution witnesses, only 28 prosecution witnesses have been examined. The statements of Investigating Officer have been recorded and petitioners are in custody since 27.07.2023, hence, petitioners be released on bail. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor opposed the bail applications. 5. The earlier bail applications filed by accused petitioners have been rejected on merits, taking note of the fact that petitioners are main accused in the present case against whom, the allegation is to trample the tractor on the head of deceased Sanju Bai, who died on spot; there is no change in circumstances except that few of other prosecution witnesses have been examined. Further this Court deprecates the practice of accused petitioners to file repeated bail applications within short span of time before this Court. 6. As a result, both bail applications are dismissed. 7. However, it is hereby directed that the trial Court shall make an endeavor to conclude the criminal trial expeditiously as early as possible. 8. A copy of this order be sent to the trial Court for compliance. (SUDESH BANSAL),J NITIN /3-4