Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 21286 (KAR)

MRS. ANNAMMA v. SRI. TUSHAR GIRI NATH

CCC/362/2023 · 2025-03-05

K Somashekar, Venkatesh Naik T

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:9308-DB CCC No. 362 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.SOMASHEKAR AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE VENKATESH NAIK T CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 362 OF 2023 (-) BETWEEN: MRS. ANNAMMA W/O. LATE VENKATESH, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, R/AT NO.76, 1ST MAIN, BAKSHI GARDEN, BELIMUTT ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 053. …COMPLAINANT (BY SRI. PRAKASH K A., ADVOCATE (ABSENT) ) AND: 1. SRI. TUSHAR GIRI NATH COMMISSIONER, BRUHAT BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE, N.R. SQUARE, BENGALURU - 560 001. 2. SRI. LOKANATH THE JOINT COMMISSIONER, BRUHAT BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE, WEST DIVISION, MALLESHWARAM, BENGALURU - 560 003. 3. SRI. KEERTHI PRASAD THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, Digitally signed by MOUNESHWARAPPA NAGARATHNA Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:9308-DB CCC No. 362 of 2023 BRUHAT BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE, DRY WASTE MANAGEMENT CENTRE, TULASI THOTA, BALEPETE, BENGALURU - 560 053. …ACCUSED (BY SRI. N. K. RAMESH, ADVOCATE FOR A2 & A3; SRI. S.H.PRASHANTH, ADVOCATE FOR A1) THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTION 11 AND 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971 R/W ARTICLE 215 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SUMMON THE ACCUSED AND TO TAKE APPROPRIATE ACTION UNDER THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT FOR THE WILLFUL DISOBEDIENCE OF THE DIRECTIONS ISSUED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE OF THIS HON'BLE COURT VIDE ORDER DATED:16.12.2022 PASSED IN WP NO.16629/2021(S-RES) VIDE ANNEXURE-A. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.SOMASHEKAR and HON'BLE MR JUSTICE VENKATESH NAIK T ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.SOMASHEKAR) This contempt petition is filed by the complainant for disobedience of the order passed by the learned Single Judge in Writ Petition No.16629/2021 (S-Res) dated 16.12.2022. 2. Sri Prakash K.A, learned counsel appears for the complainant and Sri N.K. Ramesh, learned counsel appears for accused Nos.2 and 3 are neither present through VC nor - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:9308-DB CCC No. 362 of 2023 physically before this Court. Whereas, Sri S.H. Prashanth, learned counsel appearing for accused No.1 is present physically before the Court and submits that the order rendered by the learned single Judge in the aforesaid writ petition on the writ side has been complied with by issuing an appointment order dated 27.10.2023 to the complainant. Further, the compliance affidavit has also been submitted by learned counsel for accused No.1 before the Court. Therefore, it is deemed appropriate that this petition does not survive for consideration to take action against the respondents-accused. 3. Consequently, the contempt proceedings is hereby dropped. Sd/- (K.SOMASHEKAR) JUDGE Sd/- (VENKATESH NAIK T) JUDGE CS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 3 CT:SK