1 2025:CGHC:21328 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MAC No. 891 of 2018 1. Ghanshyam Sahu S/o S/o Late Ghasiram Sahu Aged About 43 Years R/o Village Surda, P. S. Mungeli, District- Mungeli, Chhattisgarh. ... Appellant versus 1. Chandkali W/o Late Shri Chaman Kumar, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Village Ghoghapara, P. S. Lalpur, Tahsil Lormi, District- Mungeli, Chhattisgarh. 2. Love Kumar S/o Late Shri Chaman Kumar, Aged About 5 Years, Minor Through Natural Gardian App. No. 1 Chandkali W/o Late Shri Chaman Kumar. R/o Village Ghoghapara, P. S. Lalpur, Tahsil Lormi, District- Mungeli, Chhattisgarh. 3. Ku. Neeshu, D/o Late Shri Chaman Kumar, Aged About 3 Years Minor Through Natural Gardian App. No. 1 Chandkali, W/o Late Shri Chaman Kumar. R/o Village Ghoghapara, P. S. Lalpur, Tahsil Lormi, District- Mungeli, Chhattisgarh. 4. Ku. Khushi, D/o Late Shri Chaman Kumar, Aged About 1 Years Minor Through Natural Gardian App. No. 1 Chandkali, W/o Late Shri Chaman Kumar. R/o Village Ghoghapara, P. S. Lalpur, Tahsil Lormi, District- Mungeli, Chhattisgarh. 5. Vishram S/o Late Shri Kartik Ram Aged About 50 Years R/o Village Ghoghapara, P. S. Lalpur, Tahsil Lormi, District- Mungeli, Chhattisgarh. SOURABH PATEL Digitally signed by SOURABH PATEL Date: 2025.05.08 18:09:54 +0530 2 6. Ramhulla Bai, W/o Shri Vishram Aged About 48 Years, R/o Village Ghoghapara, P. S. Lalpur, Tahsil Lormi, District- Mungeli, Chhattisgarh. 7. Heerapanna Baghel, S/o Horilal Aged About 23 Years, R/o Village Pasrakapa, P. S. Lalpur, Tahsil- Lormi, District Mungeli, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondents For Appellant : None. For Respondents : None. Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal Order on Board 08/05/2025 1. Today none appears on behalf of the appellant even when the case is taken up for hearing in second round and also on 30.04.2025 and 29.08.2018, no one has been appearing on behalf of the appellant, it appears that the appellant is not interested in this case. 2. In the absence of any representation on behalf of the appellant, this Court is left with no other option but to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. 3. Accordingly, the instant appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal) Judge Sourabh P.