APHC010301222006 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) SATURDAY,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: Between: 1. M. CHOWDAIAH, RETD. MARKETING OFFICER, APCP, KADAPA R/O 1.11.478, ARVINDANAGAR EXTENSION, ANANTAPUR 1. THE AP STATE HANDLOOM WEAVERS COOP SOCIETY ANOTHER, WEAVERS' CO WEAVERS BHAVAN, NARAYANAGUDA, HYDERABAD, REP BY VC AND MANAGING DIRECTOR 2. SRI S JOHAR BASHA DO HT/ENQUIRY OFFICER, THE ANDHRA PRADESH STATE HANDLOOM WEAVERS' CO SOCIETY LIMITED, (APCO), WEAVERS BHAVAN NARAYANAGUDA, HYDERABAD Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toissue a Writ order or direction particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring that conduct enquiry against the petitioner and also the Notice issued in Ref. No. DE/MC/Dmo/Tpt. Dvn./2006/2258/2764/ dated 20 respondnet are wholly illegal, without jurisdiction andvoid ab ini such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper inthe circumstances of the case. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) SATURDAY,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 13381/2006 M. CHOWDAIAH, RETD. MARKETING OFFICER, APCP, KADAPA R/O 1.11.478, ARVINDANAGAR EXTENSION, ANANTAPUR ...PETITIONER AND THE AP STATE HANDLOOM WEAVERS COOP SOCIETY ANOTHER, WEAVERS' CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED (APCO), BHAVAN, NARAYANAGUDA, HYDERABAD, REP BY VC AND MANAGING DIRECTOR SRI S JOHAR BASHA DO HT/ENQUIRY OFFICER, THE ANDHRA PRADESH STATE HANDLOOM WEAVERS' CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED, (APCO), WEAVERS BHAVAN NARAYANAGUDA, ...RESPONDENT(S): tion under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toissue a Writ order or direction particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring that the action of the respondents in seeking to conduct enquiry against the petitioner and also the Notice issued in Ref. No. DE/MC/Dmo/Tpt. Dvn./2006/2258/2764/ dated 20-06-2006 by the second respondnet are wholly illegal, without jurisdiction andvoid ab initio and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper inthe IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3332] THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI M. CHOWDAIAH, RETD. MARKETING OFFICER, APCP, KADAPA R/O ...PETITIONER THE AP STATE HANDLOOM WEAVERS COOP SOCIETY OPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED (APCO), BHAVAN, NARAYANAGUDA, HYDERABAD, REP BY VC SRI S JOHAR BASHA DO HT/ENQUIRY OFFICER, THE ANDHRA OPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED, (APCO), WEAVERS BHAVAN NARAYANAGUDA, ...RESPONDENT(S): tion under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toissue a Writ order or direction particularly one in the nature of Writ the action of the respondents in seeking to conduct enquiry against the petitioner and also the Notice issued in Ref. No. 2006 by the second tio and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper inthe IA NO: 1 OF 2006(WPMP 16634 OF 2006 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased stay all further proceedings pursuant to the Notice issued in Ref. No. DE/MC/Dmo/TPt. Dvn./2006/2258/2764 dated 20-06-2006 by the second respondent Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. M PANDURANGA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. B JAYA PRABHAKARA RAO (SC for APCO) 2. . The Court made the following: ORDER Sri Challa Hruday Raj, learned counsel, representing Sri M.Panduranga Rao, learned counsel for petitioner, submitted, that cause in this writ petition no more survives and this writ petition has become infructuous. 2. In view of the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI RR