Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 21276 (ALL)

DEV SINGH AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

CRLP/3442/2025 · 2025-03-11

Mohd Azhar Husain Idrisi, Vivek Kumar Birla

Criminal Appealbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:36214-DB Court No. - 43 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 3442 of 2025 Petitioner :- Dev Singh And 2 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Nagesh Datt Pandey,Pulak Ganguly Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.,Siddharth Singh Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Birla,J. Hon'ble Mohd. Azhar Husain Idrisi,J. 1. Heard Sri Pulak Ganguly, learned counsel for the petitioners as well as Sri Amit Sinha, learned A.G.A. for the State respondents and Sri Siddharth Singh, learned counsel for the informant. 2. The present writ petition has been preferred with the prayer to quash the impugned First Information Report dated 17.12.2024, registered as Case Crime No. 224 of 2024, under Sections 406, 504, 506 IPC, PS Padri, District Mirzapur, and for a direction to the respondents not to arrest the petitioners in pursuance of impugned First Information Report. 3. Although the prayer for quashing of FIR has been made, but without insisting on the same, only submission is that all alleged offences are punishable with imprisonment upto seven years, therefore the police authorities are bound to follow the procedure laid down under Section 35 BNSS. The petitioners have been wrongly implicated and could not be arrested. Reliance has been placed on the judgement of Apex Court in Arnesh Kumar Vs. State of Bihar, (2014) 8 SCC 273 and Social Action Forum for Manav Adhikar Vs. Union of India, Ministry of Law and Justice and others in Writ Petition (Civil) No. 73 of 2015 with Criminal Appeal No. 1265 of 2017 Writ Petition (Criminal) No. 156 of 2017 and in Satendra Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and Another (2022) 10 SCC 51 and co-ordinate Division Bench of this Court in Vimal Kumar & 3 others Vs. State of U.P. & 3 others in 2021 (2) ACR 1147. 4. We have gone through the impugned first information report and without interfering in the same, we are of the opinion that the guidelines framed by the Apex Court in the above noted judgement are equally applicable to the facts of the instant case. 5. Accordingly, the instant petition also stands disposed of in terms of the judgements as noted above. Order Date :- 12.3.2025 Abhishek Digitally signed by :- ABHISHEK AGRAHARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad