M/S UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LTD v. SMTI DIPA LAHON AND 4 ORS
I.A.(Civil)/82/2025 · 2025-01-19
Devashis Baruah
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 21275 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 21275 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010254942024
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/82/2025 M/S UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LTD REGIONA OFFICE G.S. ROAD GUWAHATI-5 REP. BY THE CHIEF REGIONA MANAGER. VERSUS SMTI DIPA LAHON AND 4 ORS W/O. LATE DIBYA LAHON 2:AYUSHMAN LAHON REP. BY HIS MOTHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN (THEN MINOR AGED ABOUT 17 YRS) BOTH ARE R/O. SRIPURIA GUDHA ALI ROAD P/O. SRIPURIA P/S. TINSUKIA DIST. TINSUKIA ASSAM PIN-786145.
3:BONI SINGH @ S.D. BONI S/O. ANGAM SINGH AND R/O. WAITHOU CHIRU P/O. AND P/S. LILONG DIST. IMPHAL EAST MANIPUR PIN-795130.
4:M/S. KONSAM OIL SERVICES REP. BY ITS PROPRIETOR SRI KONSAM SANTOSH KUMAR SINGH S/O. LATER IHOPSSHAK SINGH R/O. CHANCHIPUR
Page No.# 2/3 P/S. SINGJAMEI DIST. IMPHAL EAST MANIPUR PIN-795130 5:THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD.
TINSUKIA DIVISION OFFICE AT RANGAGORA ROAD TINSUKIA 2ND FLOOR OF PLAZA COMPLEX P/O. AND P/S. TINSUKIA DIST. TINSUKIA ASSAM.
For the appellant (s) : Mr. M. Dutta, Advocate
For the respondent (s) : Ms. M. Nirala, Advocate BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH O R D E R
20.01.2025
This is an application for stay of the judgment and order dated 30.08.2024 passed by the learned Additional Member, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Tinsukia in MAC Case No.23/2020.
2. This Court has duly perused the judgment and order dated 30.08.2024 and admitted the accompanying Appeal today. From the materials on record and the grounds of objections taken in the accompanying Memo of Appeal, it is the opinion of this Court that the impugned judgment and order dated 30.08.2024 passed in MAC Case No.23/2020 is required to be stayed pending
Page No.# 3/3 disposal of the Appeal subject to deposit of 50% of the Award within 2 (two) months from the date of the instant order.
3. This Court further observes that the claimants, i.e. the respondent Nos.1 & 2 would be at liberty to file application before the Registry of this Court upon deposit of the said amount, and upon such application being filed, the Registry shall release the said amount to the respondent Nos.1 & 2 subject to making necessary verification and production of the Indemnity Bond.
4. In view of the above, the instant I.A. stands disposed of.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant