APHC010301132007 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] FRIDAY,THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 21584/2007 Between: 1. P.VARADAN, CHITTOOR DIST, S/O.PONNUSWAMY, R/O.D.NO.5- 87,INDIRANAGAR, CHITTOOR DIST ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE CHAIRMAN CUMMANAGING DIRECTOR HYD ANOTHER, A.P.S.R.T.C MUSHEERABAD,HYD 2. THE DEPOT MANAGER, A.P.S.R.T.C DEPOT-II, MADANAPALLE,CHITTOOR DIST ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an appropriate writ,order or direction,more particularly in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent in withholding the petitioner's terminal benefit to an amount of Rs 82,000/- as illegal,arbitrary and unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondents to forthwith relaease the petitioner's terminal benefits in the interest of justice and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2007(WPMP 27996 OF 2007 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respodents or forthwith release the terminal benefits payble to the petitioner pending disposal of the wp Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P HARINATH GUPTA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. K RAJESHWAR RAO The Court made the following: ORDER Despite listing the matter under the caption “for dismissal”, there is no representation for the petitioner. This shows that the petitioner is not interested to prosecute the matter. In view of the above, this writ petition is dismissed for non prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI RR