Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 21263 (KAR)

SRI. RAMU, v. CHANDRASEKHAR,

RFA/779/2023 · 2025-02-19

T M Nadaf, V Kameswar Rao

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:7812-DB RFA No. 779 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V KAMESWAR RAO AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE T.M.NADAF REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 779 OF 2023 (PAR) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. RAMU, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, S/O LATE SEETHAPPA, 2. SRI. LAKSHMANA, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, BOTH ARE R/AT PARVATHIPURA, MARALUBAGILU STREET, II DIVISION, DEVANAHALLI TOWN AND TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. SRINIVASA .K, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. CHANDRASEKHAR, AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, S/O LATE SEETHAPPA, 2. SRI. VENUGOPAL, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, S/O LATE SEETHAPPA, 3. SRI. RAMESH, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, S/O LATE SEETHAPPA, Digitally signed by PRAJWAL A Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:7812-DB RFA No. 779 of 2023 RESPONDENTS NO.1,2 AND 3 ARE R/AT PARVATHIPURA, MARALABAGILU STREET, II DIVISION DEVANAHALLI TOWN, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT. 4. SRI. SHANKARLINGAM, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, S/O LATE S. BALAGURUSWAMY, R/AT NO. 57, 1ST BLOCK, 2ND MAIN, BEL LAYOUT, VIDYARANYAPURA, BENGALURU-560 097. 5. SRI. T. S. RAVISHANKAR, S/O LATE T. SANGANNA, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, 6. SMT. B. T. SRIDEVI, W/O LATE T. SANGANNA, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, BOTH ARE R/AT NO. 101, ESTEEM GARDENIA, SHANKAR NAGAR, BENGALURU-92. …RESPONDENTS THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF CPC AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 09.11.2022 PASSED IN OS No.871/2016 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, DEVANAHALLI, DISMISSING THE SUIT FOR PARTITION. THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V KAMESWAR RAO and HON'BLE MR JUSTICE T.M.NADAF - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:7812-DB RFA No. 779 of 2023 ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V KAMESWAR RAO) This memo filed by the learned counsel for the appellants along with their advocate for withdrawing the appeal, which reads as under: “The appellant herein prays that this Hon’ble court may be pleased to permit the appellants to withdraw the above appeal as not pressed in the ends of justice and equity.” 2. Hence, appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. 3. Pending I.A.Nos.1/2023 and 2/2023 do not survive for consideration and stands disposed of. Sd/- (V KAMESWAR RAO) JUDGE Sd/- (T.M.NADAF) JUDGE SMC List No.: 1 Sl No.: 10