Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 21261 (KAR)

TIMOTHY CHARLES v. RESERVE BANK OF INDIA

WP/8071/2020 · 2025-01-27

Jyoti Mulimani

Review Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:3598 WP No. 8071 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 8071 OF 2020 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: TIMOTHY CHARLES AGED 31 YEARS (MALE), RESIDING AT 2B, DAFFODILS APARTMENT, TRINITY FORTUNE LAYOUT, GEDDALAHALLI, BANGALORE-560 077. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. DHANUSH.M., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. RESERVE BANK OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY THE GOVERNOR, HAVING HIS OFFICE AT: RESERVE BANK OF INDIA, CENTRAL OFFICE BUILDING, SHAHID BHAGAT SINGH ROAD, MUMBAI-400 001. 2. RESERVE BANK OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY THE REGIONAL DIRECTOR, HAVING HIS OFFICE AT 10/3/8, NRUPATHUNGA ROAD, BENGALURU-560 001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. T.SURYANARAYANA., ADVOCATE) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: Digitally signed by THEJASKUMAR N Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:3598 WP No. 8071 of 2020 ORAL ORDER Sri.Dhanush.M., counsel for the petitioner has appeared in person. Counsel submits that a memo has been filed stating that the Writ Petition may be dismissed as withdrawn. Counsel therefore, submits that the memo may be placed on record and the Writ Petition may be dismissed as withdrawn. When queried, counsel Sri.Dhanush.M., submits that a conscious decision is taken by him and the petitioner to withdraw the petition and if an order is passed, they shall not seek for recalling the same or file a review petition. The oral submission made by counsel for the petitioner and the memo is placed on record. The Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE TKN List No.: 3 Sl No.: 7