Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 2126 (RAJ)

HANUMAN v. STATE

CW/4714/1988 · 2025-03-10

Sudesh Bansal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:10823] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4714/1988 Hanuman son of Shri Balji Brahman, resident of Rojadi, Tehsil Sambhar Lake, District Jaipur. ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Rajasthan. 2. The Board of Revenue for Rajasthan at Ajmer. 3. The Additional Collector(Second) District Jaipur, Jaipur. 4. The Idol of Shri Murli Manohar Ji Rojadi, Tehsil Sambhar Lake, District Jaipur through late Shri Sheo Narain son of Shri Balji, r/o Rojadi, Tehsil Sambhar Lake, District Jaipur, through his legal representatives:- 4.1 Smt. Sarju Devi wife of late Shri Sheo Narain 4.2 Shri Chittar Mal son of late Shri Sheo Narain 4.3 Shri Moluram son of late Shri Sheo Narain 4.4 Shri Kailash son of late Shri Sheo Narain 4.5 Shri Bhagwan Sahai s/o late Shri Sheo Narain 4.6 Shri Shanker Lal son of late Shri Sheo Narain all residents of Village Rojadi, Tehsil Sambhar Lake, District Jaipur. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ashok Mishra For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL Order 10/03/2025 1. Counsel for petitioner states that he has received information that sole petitioner-Hanuman has passed away long back. None of legal representatives of deceased petitioner have come forward to pursue the writ petition on merits. [2025:RJ-JP:10823] (2 of 2) [CW-4714/1988] 2. Otherwise also, the issue raised in the writ petition is squarely covered by the judgment passed by the Division Bench of this Court in Tara & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and Anr. 2015(3) WLC 548, however, the writ petition filed by and on behalf of dead person cannot survive, hence, same is hereby dismissed. 3. Pending application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of. (SUDESH BANSAL),J SOURAV /293