S.A.K.Mohammed Sulthan v. The Deputy Collector of Stamps/Collector
WP(MD)/31888/2025 · 2025-11-10
G R Swaminathan
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 212591 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 212591 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
W.P(MD)No.31888 of 2025 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 10.11.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN W.P(MD)No.31888 of 2025 and W.M.P(MD)Nos.25075 & 25077 of 2025 S.A.K.Mohammed Sulthan ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Deputy Collector Stamps / Collector, Tuticorin District, Tuticorin. 2.The Sub Registrar, Kayalpattinam, Tuticorin District. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records relating to the impugned proceedings of the second respondent in Letter No. Dated 09.07.2024 relating to Document No.904/2023 on the file of the 2nd Respondent is concerned and quash the same as illegal. 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P(MD)No.31888 of 2025 For Petitioner : Mr.M.Mahaboob Athiff For Respondents : Mr.S.Shanmugavel Additional Government Pleader
ORDER
Heard both sides. 2.The writ petitioner is a party to the petition mentioned document. It was executed by the petitioner on 02.03.2023. It was registered as Document No.904/2023 and released. Subsequently, the audit wing of the Registration Department appears to have raised an objection that the property had been undervalued. Based on the audit objection, the registering authority raised the impugned demand calling upon the petitioner to pay the deficit stamp duty and the resultant registration charges. This demand is challenged in the writ petition on the ground of lack of jurisdiction. 3.It is well settled that only under Section 47A of the Stamp Act, the issue of valuation can be gone into. The registering authority has no 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P(MD)No.31888 of 2025 jurisdiction to determine the market valuation of the property. It is only the Special Deputy Collector (Stamps) who alone can do so after adhering to and following the procedures set out under Section 47A of the Act. In this case, such a procedure was not at all adopted. Based on the audit objection, the impugned demand has been raised. This is evident from the very face of the record. The impugned demand is therefore quashed as one lacking in jurisdiction. 4.This Writ Petition is allowed accordingly. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
10.11.2025
NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No MGA To 1.The Deputy Collector Stamps / Collector, Tuticorin District, Tuticorin. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P(MD)No.31888 of 2025 G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. MGA 2.The Sub Registrar, Kayalpattinam, Tuticorin District.
W.P(MD)No.31888 of 2025 10.11.2025 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis