Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010300622025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY. THE FOURTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 16374 OF 2025 Between: Turaka Venkataro, S/o. Turaka Veeraiha, aged about 42 Years, Bhrugubanda Village, Sattenapalle Rural, Palnadu District. ...Petitioner AND
1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, represented by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, A.P Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi.
2. The Superintendent of Police, Guntur, Guntur District.
3. The Superintendent of Police, Narasaraopet, Palnadu District.
4. The Station House officer. Central Crime Station CCS Police Station, Guntur District.
5. The Station House Officer. Central Crime Station CCS Police Station, Palnadu District. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus, or any other appropriate to Writ,
Order, or Direction, declaring the actions of Respondent No. 4 & 5 in illegally interfering with petitioner’s life and liberty by making unsolicited calls, visiting petitioner’s residence and relatives homes, demanding may petitione’s appearance at the police station without a registered FIR, and threatening to
detain petitioner and file false cases, as illegal, arbitrary, malicious, and in violation of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India, and restrain the respondents from such actions and consequently direct the respondents to ensure that petitioner is not subjected to further harassment, threats, or malicious actions at the hands of the respondents or any V person acting in concert with them. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct Respondents No. 4 and 5 to refrain from calling petitioner to the police station and harassing, threatening, initiating any coercive action, without a registered FIR, pending the writ petition’s disposal. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI BAGGI VENKATA PAVAN KUMAR Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following order:
' i# 1 ^16 HN, J W.P.No.16374 2025 APHC010300622025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] FRIDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 16374/2025 Between:
1.TURAKA VENKATARO, S/0. TURAKA VEERAIHA, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, BHRUGUBANDA VILLAGE, SATTENAPALLE RURAL, PALNADU DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1.THE STATE OF AP, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, A.P SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI. 2.THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3 3.THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, NARASARAOPET, PALNADU DISTRICT. 4.THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, CENTRAL CRIME STATION CCS POLICE STATION, GUNTUR DISTRICT, 5.THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, CENTRAL CRIME STATION CCS POLICE STATION, PALNADU DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT{S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased Issue a Writ of Mandamus, or any other appropriateto
2 HH, W.P.No.l6374_2025.
Writ, Order, or Direction, declaring the actions of Respondent No. 4 5 in illegally interfering with petitioners life and liberty by making unsolicited calls, visiting petitioner residence and relatives homes, demanding petitioner appearance at the police station without a registered FIR, and threatening to detain petitioner and file false cases, as illegal, arbitrary, malicious, and in violation of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India, and restrain the respondents from such actions and consequently direct-the respondents to ensure that petitioner is not subjected to further harassment, threats, or malicious actions at the hands of the respondents or any V person acting in concert with them and Pass lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct Respondents No. 4 and 5 to refrain from calling petitioner to the police station and harassing, threatening, initiating any coercive action, without a registered FIR, pending the writ petition’s disposal and Pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.BAGGI VENKATA PAVAN KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.GPFOR HOME
3 HNJ W.P.No.l6374_2025 The Court made the following Order:
1. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is being troubled by respondent Nos.4 and 5, though there is no case pending against him. 2. The learned Assistant Government Pleader, on instructions, submits that the petitioner is facing trial in C.C.No.4320 of 2022 and that the Magistrate has issued a non-bailable warrant. Aggrieved by the ' alleged harassment by the police officials in executing the non-bailable warrant, the writ petition has been filed. This Court is not inclined to interfere at this stage. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. 3. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shell stand closed.
Sd/-B. CHITTl JOSEPH assistant registrar SECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPY// ^ To,
1. One CC to Sri Baggi Venkata
2. Two CCs to GP for Home
3. Two CD Copies Pavan Kumar, Advocate [OPUC] High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] Cnr
HIGH COURT DATED;04/07/2025 I 0 2 SEP 2025 m ^ . Current Section .
ORDER WP NO. 16374 OF 2025 DISMISSING THE W.P.
WITHOUT COSTS