Alla Venkata Krishna Reddy v. The Government of Andhra Pradesh, represented by its
WA/230/2011 · 2025-04-01
Dhiraj Singh Thakur, Ravi Cheemalapati
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 21254 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 21254 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI TUESDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, THE CHIEF JUSTICE AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPAT^ WRIT APPEAL NO: 230 OF 2011 Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the order dated 20.10.2010 in WP No. 19873 of 2010 on the file of the High Court. ^ Between: Alla Venkata Krishna Reddy, S/o.Venkatasubba Reddy R/o. Door NO.27-1-1084/B, Balajinagar, Nellore, Proprietor of Saritha Restaurant & Bar, Door No. 17/294-F, Achari Street, Barkass, Nellore. ...Appellant/Petitione^- AND
1. The Government of Andhra Pradesh, represented by its. Principal Secretary, Prohibition and Excise Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. The Commissioner, Prohibition and Excise, Government of A.P., Hyderabad. The Prohibition and Excise Superintendent, Nellore, Nellore District.
2.
3. ...Respondents/Respondents I.A. NO: 2 OF 2011(WAMP. NO: 533 OF 20111 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 1st respondent to consider refund of the proportionate X
license fee of Rs. 7,94,224/- for the period commencing from 12-08-2008 to 27-12-2008 during which period the petitioner could not run M/s Saritha Bar and Restaurant, Door No.17-294-F, achari street, Barkass, Nellore, pending disposal of the above WA.^ Counsel for the Appellant: SRI SRINIVAS BASAVA LEARNED COUNS^ REPRESENTING SRI. S SRINIVAS REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR PROHIBITION & EXCISE ^ The Court made the following order:
APHC010300572011 Bench Sr.No:-2 [3483] IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI WRIT APPEAL NO: 230 of 2011 Alla Venkata Krishna Reddy ...Appellant Vs. The Government of Andhra Pradesh and others ...Respondents ********** Advocate for Appellant Sri Srinivas Basava,
learned counsel representing Sri S. Srinivas Reddy Advocate for Respondents Learned Government Pleader for Prohibition and Excise
CORAM :THE CHIEF JUSTICE DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR SRIJUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI DATE : 1st April 2025 PC : Sri Srinivas Basava,
learned counsel representing Sri S. Srinivas Reddy, learned for the appellant, states that the matter has been rendered infructuous. Accordingly, the Writ Appeal is disposed of as infructuous. No costs.
2. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand cipsed.
//TRUE COPY// DEPU SECTION OFFICER To,
1. The Principal Secretary, Prohibition and Excise Department, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur^
2. The Commissioner, Prohibition and Excise, Government of A.P., Vijayawada.
3. The Prohibition and Excise Superintendent, Nellore, Nellore District. /
&
4. One CC to Sri. S Srinivas Reddy Advocate [OPUC] '—
5. Two CCs to GP for Prohibition & Excise, High Court Of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT]
6. Three CD Copies GSC /
HIGH COURT DATED: 1/4/2025
JUDGMENT WA.No.230 of 2011 I 0 7 APR 2025 . Current Section ★ DISPOSING OF THE WA AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS /