RINKU @ DULLI S/O SHRI SHIVLAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/7351/2025 · 2025-08-11
Ashok Kumar Jain
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 21248 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 21248 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:31502] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7351/2025 Rinku @ Dulli S/o Shri Shivlal, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Kharkhada, P.s. Rajgarh, District Alwar (Raj.) (At Present Confined In Central Jail Alwar). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mohar Pal Meena For Respondent(s) : Mr. Anil Kumar Jain Mr. Devi Singh, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN
Order 11/08/2025
1. This instant application for bail filed under Section 483 of BNSS by the applicant-accused Rinku @ Dulli S/o Shri Shivlal in FIR No. 98/2025 dated 22.02.2025 registered at P.S. Rajgarh District -Alwar, whereby the applicant-accused was charged under Sections 189(2), 115(2), 126(2), 324(4) of BNS.
2. The applicant was arrested and is in judicial custody since his arrest. The Court below has dismissed the bail application.
3.
Learned counsel for the applicant relying upon grounds raised in bail application submits that the applicant is innocent and falsely implicated in the present case. Further, he submits that the investigation relating to present applicant-accused is complete and is no more required by the Investigating Agency for investigation. He further
[2025:RJ-JP:31502] (2 of 4) [CRLMB-7351/2025] assures that in case, the applicant-accused is required for further investigation, the applicant-accused will be available for such investigation. He also submits that the investigation/trial will take its own time and no purpose will be served by keeping the applicant-accused in custody.
4.
Learned counsel for petitioner submitted that the facts of the case clearly indicated that before registration of instant FIR, a cross FIR No.96/2025 was registered by petitioner. He further submitted that to counter the charge in FIR, instant report is registered by complainant. He further submitted that no specific attribution is made upon present petitioner for causing any specific injury. He also submitted that injured complainant is in police and by influence, he has registered this case. At last, he submitted that after investigation, charge-sheet has been filed.
5. Aforesaid contentions were opposed by learned Public Prosecutor and learned counsel for complainant. Learned Public Prosecutor has submitted report received from concerned police station and same is taken on record.
Learned counsel for complainant submitted that injures has sustained grievous injury and same is dangerous to life and attribution is upon present petitioner. 6. Heard learned counsel for the parties and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material placed on record. 7. On the basis of report lodged by Birdhi Chand on 22.02.2025 about assault by group of persons including present petitioner and assault upon his son Ramkesh, a report was registered. During investigation, injury report and medical
[2025:RJ-JP:31502] (3 of 4) [CRLMB-7351/2025] report of Ramkesh has been procured and after investigation, police has found involvement of Rinku @ Duli, Shivlal, Devkaran and Vishal and police has filed charge- sheet. 8. A copy of FIR No.96/2025 dated 21.02.2025 is also on record which was lodged by Basanti against Ramkesh and Birdhi Chand. It is also evident that Ramkesh is a police personnel and posted at P.S. Malakhera, Alwar. The facts of the case clearly indicated that marriage of sister of petitioner was scheduled on 05.05.2025. The report submitted by police indicated that there were three injuries upon Ramkesh and injury No.1 is grievous in nature and same was opined as could have been dangerous to life. The investigation is completed and petitioner is in custody since 01.05.2025. 9. Upon hearing the arguments and perusing the record, we have found that the applicant-accused is no more required in the investigation and he is in custody for quite some time. The further proceedings will take its own time, therefore, looking to entirety of facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, the Court deems it appropriate to grant bail to the applicant- accused. 10. Thus, the instant bail application filed on behalf of applicant- accused Rinku @ Dulli S/o Shri Shivlal, is hereby allowed and the applicant-accused is ordered to be released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond of ₹50,000/- with two sureties of like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court with the following conditions:-
[2025:RJ-JP:31502] (4 of 4) [CRLMB-7351/2025] (i) The applicant-accused shall not tamper with
evidence or influence the witness in any manner. (ii) The applicant-accused shall not indulge in any criminal activity and shall not repeat any criminal offence punishable under the Law.
(iii) The applicant-accused shall attend the hearing of the Trial Court on the date fixed by the Trial court or as and when asked to appear before the Trial Court. (iv) In case of any violation of above conditions, the bail granted to the applicant-accused shall be liable to be canceled. 11. The Registry is directed to send a copy of this order to the Trial Court through E-mail. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J PREETI VALECHA /167