Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 212401 (MAD)

M.Karthikeyan, v. The District Collector,

WP(MD)/29519/2025 · 2025-10-17

G R Swaminathan

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P(MD)No.29519 of 2025 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 17.10.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN W.P(MD)No.29519 of 2025 M.Karthikeyan ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, Karur District, Karur. 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Karur, Karur District. 3.The Tahsildar, Aravakurichi, Karur District. 4.The Punjaukalakurichi Village Panchayat, Punjaikalakurichi, Aravakurichi Taluk, Karur District, Through its Special Officer 5.The Block Development Officer, K.Paramathi Panchayat Union, K.Paramathi, Karur District. 6.R.Duraisamy 7.Kandasamy ... Respondents 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No.29519 of 2025 Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents 3 and 5 to remove the karuvelam trees and throny bushes in the village pathway comprised in Survey No.3 situated at Punjaikalakuruchi Village, Karur Taluk, Karur District by considering the petitioner's representation dated 18.06.2025. For Petitioner : Mr.M.P.Senthil For Respondents : Mr.K.S.Selvaganesan Additional Government Pleader for R1 to R4 : Mr.P.Subbaraj Special Government Pleader for R5 ORDER Heard the learned counsel for the writ petitioner and the learned law officers for R1 to R5. Issuance of notice to R6 & R7 is dispensed with. 2. The petitioner wants the seemaikaruvelam trees and thorny bushes in the petition mentioned pathway to be cleared. His specific allegation is that R6 & R7 are preventing the same. 3. The Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court has been repeatedly emphasizing that seemaikaruvelam trees should be removed. The petitioner is 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No.29519 of 2025 permitted to remove the trees in question in the petition mentioned pathway. The petitioner is permitted to engage JCB and deploy the same under the supervision of the fifth respondent. The fifth respondent need not be personally present. He can depute any official. If any obstruction is encountered from R6 & R7 and any other private party, it is for the authorities to deal with the same and facilitate the removal of seemaikaruvelam trees by the writ petitioner. 4. The Writ Petition is allowed. No costs. 17.10.2025 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No rmi To 1.The District Collector, Karur District, Karur. 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Karur, Karur District. 3.The Tahsildar, Aravakurichi, Karur District. 4.The Punjaukalakurichi Village Panchayat, Punjaikalakurichi, Aravakurichi Taluk, Karur District, Through its Special Officer 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No.29519 of 2025 G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. rmi 5.The Block Development Officer, K.Paramathi Panchayat Union, K.Paramathi, Karur District. W.P(MD)No.29519 of 2025 17.10.2025 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis