Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 21240 (KAR)

M/S CAPRI MEAT HOUSE (PVT.) LTD. v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/1289/2016 · 2025-06-10

Sachin Shankar Magadum

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:19747 WP No. 1289 of 2016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM WRIT PETITION NO. 1289 OF 2016 (LB-BMP) BETWEEN: M/S. CAPRI MEAT HOUSE (PVT.) LTD., BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, NO.1, VENKATESHWARA NAGAR, VALASARAVAKKAM, CHENNAI - 600 087. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. PUTTIGE R. RAMESH, SR. COUNSEL FOR SMT. LAKSHMI S. HOLLA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, VIKASA SOUDHA, DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 001. 2. BRUHATH BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE BY ITS COMMISSIONER, N.R. SQUARE, BANGALORE - 560 002. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE RAMNAGAR DISTRICT, BANGALORE-MYSORE ROAD, RAMANAGAR - 571 511. Digitally signed by CHAITHRA A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:19747 WP No. 1289 of 2016 4. KARNATAKA STATE INDUSTRIAL AREA DEVELOPMENT BOARD, BY ITS CHEIF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, 14/3, 2ND FLOOR, R.P. BUILDING, NRUPATHUNGA ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. SPOORTHY V, HCGP FOR R1 AND R3; SRI. B.S. SATHYANAND, ADVOCATE FOR R2; SRI. P.V. CHANDRASHEKAR, ADVOCATE FOR R4) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE COMMUNICATION DATED 4.12.2015 ISSUED BY THE R-2 VIDE ANN-O AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM ORAL ORDER The learned Senior counsel for the petitioner, on instructions with the aid of instructing counsel, has filed a detailed memo and has also annexed the order passed by the BBMP dated 28.05.2025. Both counsels, in terms of the memo, fairly concede that the issue which led to the - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:19747 WP No. 1289 of 2016 filing of this writ petition is resolved and is given quietus; the same is indicated at paragraph No.5 of the memo. In the light of submission made by both counsel, the memo is taken on record. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of in terms of memo. Sd/- (SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM) JUDGE HDK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 36 CT: BHK