Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 21240 (CHH)

AKASH SAHADE v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/3278/2025 · 2025-05-06

Shri Bibhu Datta Guru

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:20932 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 3278 of 2025 1 - Akash Sahade S/o Late Dukhharan Prasad Sahade Aged About 26 Years Permanent Adress - Village/ Post - Jamgaon, Tehsil - Patan, District - Durg, Chhattisgarh, Present Address - C/o Bharat Baghel, New Geeta Palace, In Front Of Sharda Vihar, Gokuldham Road, Uslapur, District - Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Health And Family Welfare And Medical Education, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, District - Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - The Collector Kanker, District - Kanker, Chhattisgarh 3 - Chief Medical And Health Officer Kanker, District - Kanker, Chhattisgarh 4 - Block Medical Officer Community Health Centre, Charama, District - Kanker, Chhattisgarh Respondent(s) (Cause title taken from CIS) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ashish Pandey, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. S.S. Choubey, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru , Judge Order on Board AMARDEEP CHOUBEY Digitally signed by AMARDEEP CHOUBEY Date: 2025.05.09 16:36:22 +0530 2 07/05/2025 1. By the present writ petition, the petitioner is seeking a direction towards the respondents authorities to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 29/03/2019 for compassionate appointment. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner’s mother who was working on the post of ANM(Auxiliary Nurse and Midwife), died on 16.10.1998. Thereafter, the petitioner submitted an application for compassionate appointment before the respondents authorities on 29.03.2019 Annexure P-1, but till date, no decision has been taken on the application submitted by the petitioner, by which, the petitioner is seeking an appointment on compassionate ground under the policy of the State Government. 3. Learned counsel for the State/respondent submits that if the application of the petitioner is still pending before the respondent authorities, the same shall be decided in accordance with law and the policy of the State Government within a stipulated period. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties, perused the pleadings and documents. 5. In view of submission made by learned counsel for the respondent/State, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.3/C.M.H.O. to consider and decide the case of the petitioner of compassionate appointment in accordance with the policy of the State Government within a period of 60 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order. 3 6. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the writ petition stands disposed of. SD/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) Judge Amardeep