KEF @ MOHAMMAD KAIF S/O AYUB v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/7383/2025 · 2025-07-08
Pramil Kumar Mathur
Public Interest Litigationbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 21236 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 21236 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:25178] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7383/2025 Kef @ Mohammad Kaif S/o Ayub, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Unchki (Piliki) Police Station Kaithwada, District Deeg (Raj.). (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Sub Jail Deeg). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rahul Sinsinwar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR
Order 08/07/2025
1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.0147/2024 registered at Police Station-Kaithwara, District-Deeg for the offences under Sections 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 61(2)(a) of BNS, Section 66(D) of the IT Act and Section 3/25 of the Arms Act.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the petitioner is not named in the FIR and the persons-Dilshad, Sahil, Arbaj and Khalid, whose name is mentioned in the FIR, have already been enlarged on bail by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court on 02.12.2024. The case of the present petitioner is same to that of other co-accused. He again submits that the petitioner is
[2025:RJ-JP:25178] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-7383/2025] behind the Bars since 18.05.2025. The trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody, hence the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.
5. On consideration of the rival submission and material available on record and deliberating all the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner.
6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioner-Kef @ Mohammad Kaif S/o Ayub shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for his appearance before that Court on all the dates till conclusion of the trial.
(PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J sunita/120