- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:21564-DB CCC No.850/2014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S.MUDAGAL AND THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE P SREE SUDHA CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO.850/2014 BETWEEN: C.S.UMESHAIAH S/O LATE SIDDAVEERAPPA AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS R/AT CHIKKAVEERAIAHNAPALYA VILLAGE THAVAREKERE HOBLI BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK …COMPLAINANT (BY SRI NAVEEN BABU C.S., ADVOCATE FOR SRI P.H.VIRUPAKSHAIAH, ADVOCATE) AND: DR B.R.DAYANAND TAHSILDAR BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK BANGALORE …ACCUSED (BY SRI MURUGESH V.CHARATI, ADVOCATE & SMT.MAMATHA SHETTY, AGA) THIS CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTIONS 11 & 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURT ACT, 1971 PRAYING TO TAKE NECESSARY ACTION AGAINST THE ACCUSED FOR DISOBEYING THE ORDER DATED 27.10.2010 (ANNEXURE-G) PASSED BY THIS COURT IN W.P.NO.33743/2010. THIS CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S.MUDAGAL AND HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE P SREE SUDHA Digitally signed by K S RENUKAMBA Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:21564-DB CCC No.850/2014 ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S.MUDAGAL) Registry has placed the order of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in SLP(C) Nos.845-846/2018 passed on 12.02.2025. The said order shows that the order of this Court on 04.12.2017 deciding to frame charges and 06.12.2017 framing the charges against the accused have been quashed on the ground that the respondent/accused was suspended from service during the period when there was alleged non-compliance of the order. Further the Hon’ble Supreme Court has reserved liberty to the complainant to initiate fresh contempt proceedings against the officers who were responsible for compliance of the directions. 2. In view of the said order, there is no scope to proceed further against the accused. Therefore, the proceedings against the accused are dropped. Sd/- (K.S.MUDAGAL) JUDGE Sd/- (P SREE SUDHA) JUDGE KSR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 9