Kadigithala Venkataramana v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
WP/17758/2021 · 2025-09-17
Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 21235 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 21235 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010299912021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 17758/2021 Between:
1. KADIGITHALA VENKATARAMANA, S/O. NAGHABHUSHANAM, AGE 63 YEARS, OCC. ADVOCATE, R/O. DOOR NO. 21-7-34, KORLAMPETA, 35 WARD, RAJAMAHENDRAVARA -533104
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, (HOME DEPARTMENT), SECRETARIAT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P.,
2. THE S P URABN A P POLICE DEPARTMENT, RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM, E.G. DIST, ANDHRA PRADESH.
3. THE D S P A P POLICE DEPARTMENT, NEAR ASHOKA CINEMA TALKIES, RAJA MA HENDRAVA RAM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, A.P.
4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, III TOWN STATION POLICE STATION,
A.P. POLICE DEPARTMENT, RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM, E.G. DISTRICT. A.P. CENTRAL ZONE DIVISION.
5. KADIGITHALA RAVI KUMARI, W/O KVD RAMACHANDRA RAO, D.NO.21-07-29/2, KORLAMPETA, RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM.
6. KADIGITHALA RAJYALAKSHMI, W/O CHITTIBABU, D.NO.21-07-
2
29/2, KORLAMPETA, RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM.
7. VENNA SATYANARAYANA, S/O ANANDA RAO, D.NO.21-07-17, THUMMALOVA, RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM.
8. VENNA GANESH, S/O ANANDA RAO,
D.NO.21-07-17, THUMMALOVA, RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM.
9. VANUMU SRINIVASA RAO, S/O TRIMURTHYLU, D.NO.21-07-17, NANDARADA VILLAGE, THUMMALOVA, RAJANAGARAM MANDAL, RAJAHMAHENDRAVARAM, E.G. DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. PALLA BALU ANIL KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME
The Court made the following:
ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for:
“…to issue writ order direction more particularly one in the nature of Mandamus declare the inaction of the 4th respondent not conducting inquiry/investgate and not filing charge sheet even after lapse of 2 years in Crime no. 406 of 2019 on the file of the The Station House Officer, III Town Station Police Station, A.P. Police Department, Rajamahendravaram, E.G. District, is illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and violative Art.14 and 21 of the Constitution of India, besides being violative Of Principles of Natural Justice, and consequently to direct the respondents to investigate the matter and file charge sheet in Crime no. 406 of 2019 dated 08-07-2019 on the file of the The Station House Officer, III Town Station Police Station,
3
A.P. Police Department, Rajamahendravaram, E.G. District forthwith…”
2. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that no further orders are required in this matter and the petition may be disposed of.
3. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No
order as to Costs.
Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________________________ Dr. VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA, J
Date: 18.09.2025 ASR
4
HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
W.P.No.17758 of 2021
Dated.18.09.2025
ASR