Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 21235 (AP)

Kadigithala Venkataramana v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/17758/2021 · 2025-09-17

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010299912021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 17758/2021 Between: 1. KADIGITHALA VENKATARAMANA, S/O. NAGHABHUSHANAM, AGE 63 YEARS, OCC. ADVOCATE, R/O. DOOR NO. 21-7-34, KORLAMPETA, 35 WARD, RAJAMAHENDRAVARA -533104 ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, (HOME DEPARTMENT), SECRETARIAT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P., 2. THE S P URABN A P POLICE DEPARTMENT, RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM, E.G. DIST, ANDHRA PRADESH. 3. THE D S P A P POLICE DEPARTMENT, NEAR ASHOKA CINEMA TALKIES, RAJA MA HENDRAVA RAM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, A.P. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, III TOWN STATION POLICE STATION, A.P. POLICE DEPARTMENT, RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM, E.G. DISTRICT. A.P. CENTRAL ZONE DIVISION. 5. KADIGITHALA RAVI KUMARI, W/O KVD RAMACHANDRA RAO, D.NO.21-07-29/2, KORLAMPETA, RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM. 6. KADIGITHALA RAJYALAKSHMI, W/O CHITTIBABU, D.NO.21-07- 2 29/2, KORLAMPETA, RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM. 7. VENNA SATYANARAYANA, S/O ANANDA RAO, D.NO.21-07-17, THUMMALOVA, RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM. 8. VENNA GANESH, S/O ANANDA RAO, D.NO.21-07-17, THUMMALOVA, RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM. 9. VANUMU SRINIVASA RAO, S/O TRIMURTHYLU, D.NO.21-07-17, NANDARADA VILLAGE, THUMMALOVA, RAJANAGARAM MANDAL, RAJAHMAHENDRAVARAM, E.G. DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. PALLA BALU ANIL KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…to issue writ order direction more particularly one in the nature of Mandamus declare the inaction of the 4th respondent not conducting inquiry/investgate and not filing charge sheet even after lapse of 2 years in Crime no. 406 of 2019 on the file of the The Station House Officer, III Town Station Police Station, A.P. Police Department, Rajamahendravaram, E.G. District, is illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and violative Art.14 and 21 of the Constitution of India, besides being violative Of Principles of Natural Justice, and consequently to direct the respondents to investigate the matter and file charge sheet in Crime no. 406 of 2019 dated 08-07-2019 on the file of the The Station House Officer, III Town Station Police Station, 3 A.P. Police Department, Rajamahendravaram, E.G. District forthwith…” 2. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that no further orders are required in this matter and the petition may be disposed of. 3. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to Costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________________________ Dr. VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA, J Date: 18.09.2025 ASR 4 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.17758 of 2021 Dated.18.09.2025 ASR