1 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WP227 No. 562 of 2018  Man Sai S/o Parsuram, Aged About 60 Years R/o Village Goverdhanpur, Tahsil And District Raigarh Chhattisgarh., District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1. Peela Ram S/o Vrinda Van Bhuihar Aged About 68 Years R/o Village Gudgahan, Tahsil And District Raigarh Chhattisgarh., District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh 2. Ashok Mehta R/o Railway Banglapara, Raigarh, Tahsil And District Raigarh Chhattisgarh., District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh 3. Ajeet Mehta R/o Railway Banglapara, Raigarh, Tahsil And District Raigarh Chhattisgarh., District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh 4. Shani Bai D/o Parshuram, R/o Goverdhanpur, Tehsil And District - Raigarh Chhattisgarh., District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) (Cause Title is taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. Rahul Pathak, Advocate holding the brief of Mr. Awadh Tripathi, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 15. 04.2025 1. By way of this petition, the petitioner has sought the following relief(s):- “10.1 That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) Raigarh to decide the Revenue Case No. 19A/23/2015-16 expeditiously as far as possible, in the interest of justice. 10.2 That, the respondent no. 1 Peela Ram has applying for lease of such suit property before the Sub SIDDHANT TAMRAKAR Digitally signed by SIDDHANT TAMRAKAR Date: 2025.04.15 17:21:57 +0530 2 Registrar, District Registrar Office, Raigarh, which may be directed to be cancelled till the disposal of the revenue case No. 19A/23/2015-16 as pending before the S.D.O. Raigarh. 10.3 That, any other relief which this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper may also kindly be granted to the petitioner in the interest of justice along with cost of the petition.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that applications moved under Section 170 B of C.G. Land Revenue Code, 1959 and under Order 1 Rule 10 of C.P.C. read with Section 43 of Land Revenue Code, 1959 are pending consideration before the Sub-Divisional Officer(Revenue), Raigarh. He would pray for a direction to the said authority to decide the pending applications expeditiously. 3. Heard. 4. Taking into consideration the submission made by Mr. Pathak, the instant petition is disposed of with a direction to the Sub-Divisional Officer (Revenue), Raigarh to decide the Revenue Case No. 19A/23/2015-16 expeditiously, if already not decided. 5. With the aforesaid observation(s), the instant petition is hereby disposed of. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge $iddhant