Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 21233 (BOM)

PRAMOD PURUSHOTTAM PATIL (GPA) PRAHLAD AND ANOTHER v. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, JALGAON AND OTHERS

CA/9992/2021 · 2025-02-05

Shri Sandipkumar C More

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

(1) 927 CA-9991.2021.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 927 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9991 OF 2021 IN FAST/20055/2021 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9990 OF 2021 IN FAST/19872/2021 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9992 OF 2021 IN FAST/20060/2021 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9993 OF 2021 IN FAST/20063/2021 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9995 OF 2021 IN FAST/20065/2021 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9994 OF 2021 IN FAST/20069/2021 JANARDHAN WAMAN ROTE VERSUS THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, JALGAON AND OTHERS … Mr. Ajeet B. Kale, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. D.J. Patil, A.G.P. for respondent Nos.1 and 2. Mr. Sandesh Patil, Advocate for respondent No.3 in Civil Application No.9992 of 2021. Mr. A.R. Lukhe, Advocate holding for Mr. A.S. Shelke, Advocate for Acquiring Body. ... CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J. DATED : 5 FEBRUARY 2025. ORDER:- 1. Heard rival submissions. 2. The respective applicants are seeking condonation of delay of 45 days in all these applications, which appears to be caused due to their poor financial condition. 2025:BHC-AUG:3328 (2) 927 CA-9991.2021.odt 3. Though the application is opposed, but considering the short period of delay, the applications are allowed in terms of prayer clause (B) and disposed of accordingly. 4. The appeals be placed for admission after removal of office objections, if any. (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.) VD_Dhirde