SADIQ HUSSAIN v. STATE TH.HIGHER EDUCATION AND ORS.
SWP/1278/2013 · 2025-03-04
Wasim Sadiq Nargal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2123 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2123 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
Case:- SWP No. 1278/2013
Sadiq Hussain …..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: None
Vs
State of J&K and Ors. .…. Respondent(s)
Through: None
Coram:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE
ORDER (04.03.2025)
01. Record reveals that there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner on 08.08.2013 and the instant petition has come up before this Court after twelve years and during the intervening period, no effort has been made by the petitioner to get the instant petition listed.
02. Today also, when the instant petition was taken up, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner, which clearly shows that the petitioner has lost interest to prosecute this petition.
03. Hence, the instant petition is dismissed for non-prosecution along with connected application(s).
04. Interim directions, if any, shall stand vacated.
(WASIM SADIQ NARGAL) JUDGE JAMMU
04.03.2025
Riya
S. No. 26