AJAY TIWARI ALIAS AJAY KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
BAIL/30246/2025 · 2026-04-22
Krishan Pahal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2123 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2123 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 30246 of 2025 Court No. - 65 (Sr. No.146 out of 259) HON'BLE KRISHAN PAHAL, J.
1. List has been revised. As informed by learned A.G.A., notice to the informant has been served on 04.04.2026, but none is present on behalf of the informant. 2. Heard Sri Brahma Kumar Tiwari, Advocate holding brief of Sri Virendra Kumar Tiwari, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Ram Mohit Yadav, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material placed on record. 3. Applicant seeks bail in Sessions Trial No.358 of 2025 arising out of Case Crime No.23 of 2025, under Sections 137(2), 87, 65(1) BNS and Sections 3/4(2) of POCSO Act, Police Station- Naubasta, District- Kanpur Nagar, during the pendency of trial. 4. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties, this Court finds that the statement of the victim recorded u/s 183 BNSS prima facie indicates her consent, as she had married the applicant in a temple and stayed with him. As per ossification test report, the victim is 16 years old. In view of the judgments of the Supreme Court in Jaya Mala Vs. State of J & K, (1982) 2 SCC 538 and Mohd. Imran Khan vs. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi), (2011) 10 SCC 192,, it has been held that the opinion of a radiologist regarding age is not exact and carries a margin of error of 1–2 years on either side. 5. Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, prima facie the Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Virendra Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.
Ajay Tiwari Alias Ajay Kumar .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s)
Accordingly, the bail application is allowed. 6. Let the applicant- Ajay Tiwari Alias Ajay Kumar, be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties to the satisfaction of the court concerned, subject to verification of sureties, with the conditions that he shall not tamper with evidence or intimidate witnesses and shall appear before the trial court as required. 7. Breach of any condition shall entail cancellation of bail. The observations herein shall not affect the trial on merits.
April 23, 2026 (Ravi Kant) BAIL No. 30246 of 2025 2 (Krishan Pahal,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAVI KANT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad