[2025:RJ-JP:37152] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9448/2025 Ex Captain Omprakash Kajala S/o Boduram, Aged About 54 Years, R/o Village Tetarwalo Ka Bas, Tehsil Neem Ka Thana, District Sikar, Rajasthan ----Petitioner Versus 1. State of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary, Department of Revenue, Government of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. District Collector, Sikar, Rajasthan. 3. Sub-Divisional Officer (SDO), Neem Ka Thana, District Sikar, Rajasthan. 4. Tehsildar, Neem Ka Thana, District Sikar, Rajasthan. 5. Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat, Sirohi, Tehsil Neem Ka Thana, District Sikar, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondent(s) : None present JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 12/09/2025 1. The instant writ petition has been preferred with the following prayer:- “It is, therefore, most humbly prayed that your Lordships may kindly be pleased to call for the entire record relating to the case, examine the same and accept and allow this writ petition, and- (i) by issuance of an appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature thereof and thereby directing the Respondent authorities to immediately halt and restrain the illegal and unauthorized construction of a public road over [2025:RJ-JP:37152] (2 of 3) [CW-9448/2025] the Petitioner’s undivided agricultural land bearing Khasra No.2396/2, which has not been acquired, demarcated, or lawfully demarcated for public purposes; (ii) by issuance of an appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature thereof and thereby directing the Respondents to open the gair mumkin rasta entered in the revenue record in the land bearing Khasra Nos.2396/1 and 2921/2392; (iii) any other appropriate writ, order or direction, which is deemed just and proper by this Hon’ble Court may also be passed in favour of the petitioner. (iv) Costs of the writ petition may also be awarded in favour of the petitioner.” 2. By way of filing this writ petition, multiple prayers have been made by the petitioner. 3. It appears that before filing the instant writ petition, the petitioner has approached the Authorities concerned by way of filing multiple representations for redressal of his grievances. It appears that the representations submitted by the petitioner have not been decided by the Authorities concerned by passing a reasoned and speaking order, hence, he has approached this Court by way of filing the instant writ petition. 4. In the considered opinion of this Court, the respondents are expected to decide the representation submitted by the petitioner by passing an appropriate reasoned and speaking order. 5. Keeping in view the above facts and circumstances of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to dispose of the instant writ petition by issuing direction to the respondent-Authorities to decide the representations submitted by the petitioner expeditiously as early as possible preferably within a period of [2025:RJ-JP:37152] (3 of 3) [CW-9448/2025] three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. 6. With the aforesaid observation, the instant writ petition stands disposed of. All pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. 7. Before parting with this order, it is made clear that this Court has not issued any direction/order to the respondents to decide the representation of the petitioner in a particular way. The respondents would be at liberty to decide the same, strictly in accordance with law by passing a reasoned and speaking order. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Aayush Sharma /28