Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010252832024 2025:GAU-AS:5096-DB THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/117/2025 THE UNION OF INDIA AND 2 ORS THROUGH MINISTRY OF HOME NEW DELHI 2: THE DIRECTOR GENERAL CRPF NEW DELHI 3: THE INSPECTOR GENERAL PERS O/O THE DIRECTOR GENERAL CRPF NEW DELH VERSUS PAWAN KUMAR TIWARI S/O SHRI ADYA PRASAD TIWARI, RESIDENT OF IG M.P SECTOR, BANGARASIA, BHOJPUR ROAD, BHOPAL, MADHYA PRADESH. PRESENTLY POSTED AT RECRUITS TRAINING CENTRE CRPF, AVADI, CHENNAI, TAMIL NADU, 600065 Advocate for the Petitioner : MS N T MANPOONG, MR. B DEKA Advocate for the Respondent : MS B DEVI , MR S SARMA BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE LANUSUNGKUM JAMIR HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR ORDER Date : 28.04.2025 (LANUSUNGKUM JAMIR, J.) 1. Heard Mr. B. Deka, learned CGC appearing on behalf of all the applicants. Also heard Mr. S. Sarma, learned counsel appearing for the sole opposite party. Page No.# 2/2 2. By this application, the applicants are praying for condonation of 150 days delay in preferring the connected writ appeal. 3. Mr. S. Sarma, learned counsel appearing for the sole respondent, submits that there is no proper explanation given for the delay of 150 days in the present application and therefore, the prayer for condonation should be rejected. 4. We have perused the application and on perusal of the Paragraph Nos. 2 to 9, we are of the considered opinion that the sufficient cause has been shown by the applicants for condoning the delay of 150 days. Accordingly, the delay of 150 days is condoned. 5. The I.A. is disposed. 6. The Registry is directed to number the connected writ appeal and list the matter in its usual course. JUDGE JUDGE Comparing Assistant