Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 21207 (GAU)

SADHAN HOJAI v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 9 ORS

I.A.(Civil)/3969/2024 · 2025-02-09

Nelson Sailo

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010242742024 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Linked Case : I.A.(Civil)/3969/2024 SADHAN HOJAI C/O- LATE RAIJOMONI HOJAI R/O- VTC UMRANGSO LAKE SIDE P.S. UMRANGSO SUB. DIV.- HAFLONG DIST. DIMA HASAO ASSAM PIN- 788931. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 9 ORS - REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM PUBLIC HEALTH ENGINEERING (PHE) DEPARTMENT DISPUR ASSAM GUWAHATI-781006. 2:THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM PUBLIC HEALTH ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT HENGRABARI GUWAHATI-781036. 3:THE CHIEF ENGINEER PUBLIC HEALTH ENGINEERING DEPTT. HENGRABARI ASSAM GHY-781036. 4:THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY (T) Page No.# 2/3 DIMA HASAO AUTONOMOUS COUNCIL HAFLONG ASSAM PIN- 788819. 5:THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF ENGINEER PUBLIC HEALTH ENGINEER HAFLONG DIMA HASAO PIN- 788819. 6:THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER PUBLIC HEALTH ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT UMRANGSO DIVISION UMRANGSO DIMA HASAO ASSAM PIN- 788931. 7:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM FINANCE DEPARTMENT ASSAM DISPUR GHY-781006. 8:THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL (A AND E) ASSAM MAIDAMGAON BELTOLA GHY-781029. 9:THE JOINT SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM HILLS AREA DEPARTMENT DISPUR GHY-781006. 10:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM PENSION AND PUBLIC GRIEVANCES DEPARTMENT DISPUR GHY-781006. ------------ Advocate for : MR. N SARKAR Advocate for : GA ASSAM appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 9 ORS \ Page No.# 3/3 B E F O R E HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NELSON SAILO 10.02.2025 Mr. N Sarkar, learned counsel for the applicant who submits that there is some typographical mistake in the writ petition and therefore, this application has been filed for making rectification. He submits that the rectification required has been stated in paragraph No. 3 of the instant application. He therefore prays that for ends of justice, the application may be allowed as prayed for. Mr. R R Gogoi, learned Standing Counsel, PHE (respondent Nos. 1, 2 & 3) and Mr. S K Medhi, learned CGC, learned Standing Counsel, A.G, Assam and Mr. Bhatacharjee, learned counsel for respondent No. 9 & 10 and Mr. R Borpujari, learned Standing Counsel, Finance Department (respondent No. 7) have no objection to the prayer. In view of above, the application stands allowed as prayed for. I.A stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant