Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 21207 (CHH)

INDIAN INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT RAIPUR v. Dr.PARIKSHIT CHARAN

WA/330/2025 · 2025-05-21

Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:22252-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WA No. 330 of 2025 1. Indian Institute of Management Raipur Through Chief Executive Officer, P.O. Kuru, Tehsil Abhanpur, District – Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2. Dr. Ram Kalani Director, IIM Raipur, Office Address at IIM Raipur, Tehsil Abhanpur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ... Appellant(s) versus 1. Dr. Parikshit Charan S/o Mool Singh Charan Aged About 49 Years R/o Flat No. 5, Block -1, Faculty R/o Iim Raipur Campus, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2. Board of Governor Through The Chairman Shri Puneet Dalmia, Dalmia Bharat Limited R/o 11 and 12 Floor Hansalaya Building, 15 Barakhamba Road New Delhi – 110001 3. Department of Personnel and Training Through The Secretary, Government of India Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievance And Pensions Room No. 222d, North Block New Delhi 4. Shri P.R. Devi Prasad Enquiry Officer C/o Director Indian Institute of Managment, Atal Nagar, New Raipur (C.G.) ...Respondent(s) For Appellants : Dr. Shiv Kumar Shrivastava, Advocate. For Respondent No. 1 : Mr. Sudeep Johri, and Mr. J.K. Gupta, Advocates. BRIJMOHAN MORLE Digitally signed by BRIJMOHAN MORLE Date: 2025.05.22 15:10:47 +0530 2 Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad , Judge Judgment on Board Per Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice 22 .05.2025 1. Heard Dr. Shiv Kumar Shrivastava, learned counsel for the appellants as well as Mr. Sudeep Johri and Mr. J.K. Gupta, learned counsel, appearing for respondent No. 1 on I.A. No. 4 of 2025, which is an application for leave to withdraw the writ appeal. 2. Learned counsel for the appellants submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the present appeal with the liberty to take recourse to law before the learned Single Judge. 3. Learned counsel appearing for respondent No. 1, have no objection. 4. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the reasons mentioned in the application, we are of the considered opinion that sufficient cause has been shown in the application and accordingly, I.A. No. 4 of 2025 is allowed and the present writ appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty, as prayed for. Sd/- Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Brijmohan