Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 21206 (AP)

Choppelli Jagadish v. State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/19869/2020 · 2025-09-01

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010299552020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 19869/2020 Between: 1. CHOPPELLI JAGADISH, S/O. LATE VENKATESWARA RAO, AGE 31 YEAR,OCC PVT SERVICE, R/O.D.NO.3-14, JAGANNADHAPURAM VILLAGE, PEDAVEGI MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT AT ELURU. 3. DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KOTADIBBA, ELURU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 4. INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KOTADIBBARURAL CIRCLE, KOTADIBBA, ELURU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 5. STATION HOUSE OFFICER, KOTADIBBA POLICE STATION, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 6. CHOPPELLI SOWJANYA, W/O. CHOPPELLIJAGADISH, AGED 25 YEARS,OCC PVT SERVICE, 7. YEDLASOULU RAJU, , R/O. DENDULURU VILLAGE AND MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT 8. YEDLA DHANALAKSHMI, W/O. SOULU RAJU, AGED 50 YEARS, R/O. DENDULURU VILLAGE AND MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. NIMMAGADDA REVATHI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... a issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the respondents particularly the 5th respondent at the instance of 2 the respondents 6 to 8 in repeatedly insisting petitioner to appear before their authority and threatening to implicate him in false criminal cases and arrest him, if petitioner do not yield to the terms of the 6th respondent and pay money as per her demand, as illegal, irregular, irrational, without any authority of law and violative of articles 14 and21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents particularly the 5th respondent not to interfere in any manner with petitioners personal life and liberty” 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Md.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home. 3. In the light of the interim order dated 22.10.2020 directing the respondent No.5 not to call the petitioner to the police station, no further orders are required in this matter. 4. With the said observation, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:02.09.2025 Asr 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.19869 of 2020 Dt.02.09.2025 Asr