lN THE HIGH COURT QF ANDE#RA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND'AND TWENTY FIVE :PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE SRI JuSTICE K SREENIVASA REDDY CRIMINAL PETIT!®iti NO: 6122 OF 2025 Between|[ T Venkateswara Rao, H.No 4-5-28, LJppalapati Rama Chandra Raju Street, Tannerpeta, Chittinagar, Vijayawacia, Krishna District, Aandhra PradeshT 520001 Aadhar Card No 9409 9262 4320 `-\.1` r ....petitioners/ Accused No.2 :.,.-,#;REB' 1. The State of Andhra PradeshlL, T+i.:FSugh Public prosecutor High Court J .'-'' For the State of Andhra Pradesin -` - 2. The SHO II Town Police StatiSir,'t~`,cVijayawada Andhra Pradesh. .... Respondents/ Complainant petition under section 482 #f*`rJBNSS is filed, Praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit.-filed in support of the criminal petition, the High Court may be Pleased td grant an Anticipatory Ba" to the petitioner/Accused No-2 in the event Of arrest he has tO be released on Bail ih cr'lme No 139 registered by ll Towi1-`l[Prt`±-iice Station Vijayawada On file Of the Teamed Magistrate Court at Vijaya`dif`gE`d'al -Pass Other Or further Orders as this Hon'Ble Court deemed fit and PrOP6`r t6 meet the Justice. Chief Metropolitan. The petition COm'lng On for hea`r!glg, upon Perusing the Petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof anal upoil hearing the arguments of SRI G J vlNOD KUMAR Advocate for the Pst€iti®ner, Assistant Public Prosecutor for the respondent No.1, and the Court nia`de the following. ORDER / AND The state ofAndhra pradesh and ...RESPONDENT/COMPLA]NANT(S) Others counsel for the petjtjoner/accused.I 1.G J VINOD KUMAR counsel for tJle Respondentrcomplajnant(s).I 1.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The court made the followI-ng.I QBQEBi The cr,'mI®naI Pet,I,on, under sec{IOn 482 of the Bharatjya Nagarjk suraksha sanhlta, 2023, IS filed on behalf of the pet,tloner/A2 {o grant anticlpatory ba" ln connectl|on wlth crl'me No 139/2025 of " Town po','ce stall-On, Vljayawada Town. IIIq I 2. A case has been regf|stered agajns"he pe{l'{ioner and another for the offence punishable under section 108 read wl-th 3(5) of the B.N.S. 3. case of the prosecutI'On Ion brief, Its that the deceased-Mounl-ka was married about 10 years ago wI-th the defacto complainant-Kaml'setty Krl'shna sankar and they were blessed with two daughters and they are residing at sector-2, Arl'Iova, near Government Dal'ry Farm, sundarajah Nagar, vISakhapatnam. Al js the mother of deceased resldlng at chittinagar, vljayawada. As the father of deceased died len the year 2019 in an accident, some insurance amount was recef'ved by A1. The deceased came to vI'jayawada on 30.3.2025 with children and went to the house of her mother/Al and asked about the money, for whI'Ch Al bluntly refused to gl-ve money. Then the deceased stayed at the house of her elder sl'ster up to o2 4 2025 and on the same day at 9.30 p.m, agal|n she went to the house of her mother. At that tl-me, her mother/Al and petl'{joner/A2 were there jn the house and that she asked her mother about the money, and that both of them quarreled wfth the deceased, abused her Ion filthy language and threatened her not to gfve money even jf she dies, thereby they abetted her to dle Due to such words, she was severely depressed, I-nformed the I.nCl'dent to her husband and elder sister, consumed polson and fe" down lmmedlately, the nelghbours rushed there, found the deceased jn unconscious state, shl-fled her to ~.- ~~ .JJ~, giv,rrf, i,I.,r;,~ -,~iif Government General Hospital, Vijayawada Where the Doctor declared a her as brought dead. Basing on the report, this Crime Was registered, investigated the matter, arrested Al on 24.4.2025 and sent him tO remand. 4. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant public Prosecutor for respondent-State. Perused the record. 5. Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor submits that investigation iS going on and some more witnesses are to be examined. 6. A perusal of the material available On record goes tO Show that, the only accusation that has been made as against the petitioner is he accompanied Al in taking the money from the defaCtO COmPlainant. Except the said accusation, there is nO Other material available on record to connect the petitioner with the crime. In view of the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to consider the prayer of the petitioner for grant of anticipatory bail. 7. Accordingly, in the event Of his arrest With regard tO this Crime, petitioner/A2 shall be released on bail On his executing a Personal bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees ten thousand Only) With two Sureties for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the arresting police officials and also on condition that the petitioner shall make himself available for InVestI[gatl'On aS and when requl'red and that he sha" not cause any threat, inducement or promise to the prosecutl-on wl-tnesses. The petjtl'oner she" appear before the stall-on House offI'Cer concerned, once l'n a week i.e. on every sunday between 10.00 am and o5.00 pm, till fI-ling of the charge-sheet. 8. Accordingly, the crjm]-hal petitl-on I-S a"owed. I lTFtlREir 'eOPY I I sD,-A. V§jAtrffi.'BAEglg i ASS !STRAP\ SECT'IORE.C}FFiCEpe* To, 1. The Judicial First class Magistrate Court, Vijayawada. 2. The SHO, lI Town Police Slat.ic}fap-:,-i.JLVijayawada Andhra Pradesh. 3. One CC to SRl. G J VINOD KUMAR Advocate [OPUC] 4. Two CCs to PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, High Court ofAndhra Pradesh.[OUT] 5. One spare copy ksr I HIGH couRT SRK, J DATED.. 27/06/2025 BAIL ORDER CRLP.No.6122 of 2025 ALLOWED ;g£kuxNL a €fTf i ln bu" z\th r.rf irrf' _ ,r-< -th-,.-,,-- ,i -i