APHC010071352006 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) 1 ‘'. a WEDNESDAY,THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBERIjg | TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA V/- AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA lA No.3 OF 2025 IN WRIT PETITION NO: 3891 OF 2nnfi lA No.3 OF 2025 Between: 1. The General Manager, Rep. U.O.I, South Central Railway Nilayam, Secunderabad. 2. The Chief Personnel Officer, South Central Railway, Rail Nilayam, Secunderabad. 3. The Divisional Railway Manager, South Central Railway, Guntakal Division, Guntakal. 4. The Additional Divisional Railway Manager, South Central Railway, Guntakal Division, Guntakal. 5. The Senior Guntakal Division, Guntakal. Rail Divisional Personnel Officer,, South Central Railway 6. The Senior Divisional Engineer (Co-Ordination), South Central Railway Guntakal Division, Guntakal. 7. The Assistant Divisional Engineer (Special Works), South Central Railway, Guntakal Division, Guntakal. ...PETITIONERS AND 1. Yerri Swamy, S/o. Thippanna, Ex-Gangman, G.No. 10/Bellary, R/o. Sidurpadu Village, Bevanala Post, Alarvi Mandal, Kurnool District. 2. The Central Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench, HACA Bhavan, Opp; Public Garden, Hyderabad. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may graciously be pleased to restore the WP No. 3891 of 2006, on the file of this Hon’ble court by setting aside the order, dated 05-12-2024. WRIT PETITION NO: 3891 OF 2006 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Certiorari after calling for the records relating to and connected with order in O.A.No. 1334/2004 dt. 8-9-2005 of the Central Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad (Respondent No.2) and quash the same by declaring it illegal, arbitrary, perverse and against to the statutory Rules and the law. LA NO: 1 OF 2006(WPMP 4852 OF 2Qnfi) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order in O.A.No. 1334/2004 dt. 8-9-2005 of the Central Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad (Respondent No,.2) pending disposal the above writ petition. of Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI VENNA HEMANTH KUMAR(CENTRAL GOVERNMENT COUNSEL) Counsel for the Respondent No.1: SRI ADHI VENKATESWARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent No.2:-- The Court made the following: ORDER Considering 1[he submissions made with reference to the averments made in^ffidavit filed in support of the I.A., the Writ Petition is restored to file by setting aside the order dated 05.12.2024. Sd/- K SRINIVASA RAJU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// fit SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The Central Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench, HACA Bhavan, Opp: Public Garden, Hyderabad. One CC to Sri Venna Hemanth Kumar(Central Government Counsel) [OPUC] One CC to Sri Adhi Venkateswara Rao, Advocate [OPUC] Two CD Copies 2. 3. 4. ssb HIGH COURT DATED: 15/10/2025 ORDER lA No.3 of 2025 in WP No. 3891 OF 2006 WRIT PETITION IS RESTORED