Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 21194 (KAR)

SMT.BHARATHI v. CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

WP/9951/2025 · 2025-04-17

Suraj Govindaraj

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:16198 WP No. 9951 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF APRIL, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 9951 OF 2025 (CS-RES) BETWEEN: SMT.BHARATHI W/O LOKESH.K. NAIK, AGED 40 YEARS, NO. 111, 1ST MAIN ROAD, P.G.HALLI CIRCLE, SHESHADRIPURAM, BENGALURU-560 020. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. DANAPPA PRADHANAPPA PANIBHATE., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER MATHAJI VIVIDODDESHA SAUHARDA SAHAKARI NIYAMITHA, NO.126, 1ST MAIN ROAD, SEHHADRIPURAM, BENGALURU 560 020. 2. JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OP. SOCIETY, KARNATAKA STATE SAUHARDA SAMYUKTHA SAHAKARI NIYAMITHA, SAUHARDA SAHAKARIGALA DAVA PANCHAYATHI NYAYALAYA, SAUHARDA SAHAKARA SOUDHA, NO.68, 1ST FLOOR, 17 AND 18TH CROSS, MARGOSA ROAD, MALLESHWARAM, BENGALURU-560 055. 3. SRI LOKESH KARIYAPPA NAIK SON OF KARIYAPPA NAIK, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, BENAKANAL POST, SIRASI TALUK, UTTARA KANNADA DISTRICT. Digitally signed by SHWETHA RAGHAVENDRA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:16198 WP No. 9951 of 2025 PIN NO. 581401. 4. MR.SUBRAMANYA HEGADE, SON OF NARASIMHA HEGADE, AGED 55 YEARS, NO. 46, B.S. RAJA ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BENGALURU-560 020. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. YOGEH D. NAIK., AGA FOR R2; V/O DATED 17.04.2025 NOTICE TO R1, R3 & R4 D/W) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER WRIT OR DIRECTION TO THE R2 TO QUASH THE ORDER DTD. 22.11.2024 PASSED BY THE JOINT REGISTRAR CO OP. SOCIETY BENGALURU R-2 VIDE ANNX-A AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ ORAL ORDER 1. Learned AGA accepts notice for Respondent No.2. Notice to Respondents No.1, 3 and 4 is dispensed with in view of the proposed order to be passed. 2. The Petitioner is before this Court seeking for the following reliefs: a. Issue a writ in the nature of certiorari or any other writs or direction to the R2 to quash the order dated 22.11.2024 passed by the Joint Registrar Co- operative Society, Bengaluru R2 vide Annexure-A. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:16198 WP No. 9951 of 2025 b. Pass such other orders the Hon’ble Court deems fit in the circumstances of the case, in the interest of justice and equity. 3. What has been challenged is the attachment before the judgment/order which has been passed. If at all the Petitioner has any grievance, he could always file necessary application in the proceedings pending before Respondent No.2 offering security for the said claim which could be considered by Respondent No.2. The above petition challenging the attachment before the judgment is premature one. As such, the Writ Petition stands dismissed with the above liberty reserved. SD/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE PRS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 59