Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 21191 (AP)

S.Shaikshavali v. State of Andhra Pradesh

CRLP/4792/2020 · 2025-07-20

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010299012020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 4792/2020 Between: 1. S.SHAIKSHAVALI, S/O MD.LQBAL AGED 35 YEARS RESIDING AT D.NO.26/672, DHARAMVARAM TOWN, ANANTHAPURAMU DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, , THROUGH SHO, RAPTHADU PS., REP BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT AT AMARAVATI. 2. VENNAPUSA SREERAMAREDDY, S/O LATE SUBBAREDDY, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/O PALACHERLA VILLAGE, RAPTHADU, ANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S): Petition under Section 437/438/439/482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court pleased to quash all further proceedings in FIR.No.92/ 2019 of Rapthadu Police Station, Ananthapuramu District against the petitioner/A7 and pass such other order or orders. IA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with the filing of the certified copy of 2 FIR.No.92/ 2019 of Rapthadu Police Station, Ananthapuram District and to pass such other order or orders. IA NO: 2 OF 2020 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in FIR.No.92/2019 of Rapthadu Police Station, Ananthapuramu District including arrest of the petitioner/A7, pending disposal of the Criminal Petition and pass such other order or orders. Counsel for the Petitioner/accused: 1. P NARASIMHULU Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following: ORDER : When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that, without causing any prejudice to the rights and contentions of the petitioner, the petition may be disposed of. 2. Ms.K.Priyanka Lakshmi, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor representing the respondent-State is in attendance. 3. In that view, this Criminal Petition is disposed of without causing any prejudice to the rights and contentions of the petitioner. This Court makes it clear that this Court has not expressed anything touching the merits of the case. However, the police are directed to conclude the investigation and file a 3 report according to law. Further, the petitioner is at liberty to challenge if anything goes against him, if so advised. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 21.07.2025 ARR 4 151 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 4792/2020 Dt. 21.07.2025 ARR